jeffeoff said:
Doc, the Weasel said:
Nothing is becoming obsolete. All the old material is just as usable as before. If they were making NEW stuff that you had to use instead of the old (e.g. DnD 3.5) then the old stuff would be obsolete.
What you're left with is anger over the cost going down over time. That's a strange thing to be mad at. That's kinda like being mad a video game company for releasing a $20 "game of the year" version of a game that you paid $60 for the year before. It's kinda how markets work.
That's a good, and valid, analogy. But I can still understand how it might feel like the early supporters, who stood by the game and kept it going, might feel a little burned. It's not a model we typically see in the tabletop games market, and when the contents are so tangible (as opposed to software), perhaps the feeling is more pointed.
I think your point that it's not a model we see in the tabletop gaming market is a great one. When someone buys a videogame for $60, they buy it knowing that it's going to inevitably drop in price in a few months, because that happens with every videogame. Nobody buys products for a brand new RPG expecting them to be replaced by superior new products for half the price only a few months later.
The videogame comparison would be accurate it the videogame came out for $60, then the Game Of The Year edition came out the following week for $30. It all comes down to violation of established expectations that consumers have to rely on when making purchases. When a company violates those expectations without warning, consumers are justified in not trusting them with their money in the future. I'm holding out hope that FFG hasn't done that; we won't know until we see the contents of the Player's and GM's Vaults. Anyone have details on those from GenCon?