I noticed something interesting reguarding the Adepts listing in the DHCB.....on page 48 under Loremaster heading the option to take Psy Rating 1 and minor psy power ( up to 3 times ) then on pg 49 under Magister it offers the Psy Rating 2 AND 3 on the same table as well as minor psy power ( again up to 3 times at that rank)...Ive already checked the errata file for corrections to the inconsistencies here...there were none.
My question is this simply put.....HOW? you will loose your class and have to be stuck on the Blackships to be taken and tested as a psyker if you have any psy ability.....adepts shouldnt get the ability period...and if they do get it (as brazenly as it shows AND with a suddenly potential faster progression from rating 1-3 than the actual psyker class since they have the potential to jump from rating 1 right to rating 3 if they spend the XP in the same level which is something regular psykers CANT do unless they want to spend the etra XP for the advance...but a adept can get it for regular cost....um ( can we say screw up or typo??? ).
Once you show psy ability its law that you be bound over for the Blackships and shipped off to Holy Terra for processing ( one way or the other). If the adepts get the potential ability then i think that ALL other classes should have the SAME opportunity to gain the psy ability ( afterall one of eisenhorns team members was a telekine assassin ). Does the Inquisition have the authority to ignore the rule reguarding the blackships if the newly found psyker is one of their own retinue? ( Eisenhorns tk assassin wasnt officially "sanctioned" if memory serves right ...in which case that would give Inquisitors the ability to ignore the rule if it applied to their own retinue of indentured servants...) But still doesnt go to solving or answering why a adept can get psy ability and none of the other normal classes can aquire them except through extraordinary ( chaotic) means....Can you please explain the reasoning, or, otherwise some sort of correction to the oversight if such is the case?
