https://nichurz.wixsite.com/mysite/post/armada-1-5-first-steps-into-a-larger-world-part-2-indirect-card-changes-officers

Iden interpretation is incorrect. Might want to revisit that one.

2 hours ago, Green Knight said:

Iden interpretation is incorrect. Might want to revisit that one.

I see where I went wrong thanks for pointing that out.

On 12/14/2020 at 10:07 PM, Green Knight said:

Iden interpretation is incorrect. Might want to revisit that one.

If you couldn't use the basic effect and Versio's shouldn't it say Instead of resolving the evade effect? Might be just an oversight though.

@xero989 I might add, Kallus actually could get better. With the ace cap very well could be seeing more SFC, MFC which would primarily contains aces due to their effectiveness. So more fleet will bring 2-4 aces, but less fleet brings 134 points, since you can't include the old 6-8 ace groups. So Kallus could help you in more matchups.

29 minutes ago, Rimsen said:

If you couldn't use the basic effect and Versio's shouldn't it say Instead of resolving the evade effect? Might be just an oversight though.

@xero989 I might add, Kallus actually could get better. With the ace cap very well could be seeing more SFC, MFC which would primarily contains aces due to their effectiveness. So more fleet will bring 2-4 aces, but less fleet brings 134 points, since you can't include the old 6-8 ace groups. So Kallus could help you in more matchups.

Same as Mothma.

But yeah, it could have been written like that.