Kasatka said:
Atheosis said:
Kasatka said:
I think it's safe to say that everyone, fan and authors alike, agree that the 41st millenium 2nd/3rd etc founding marines are no where near as awesome as their pre-heresy forebears.
The reason for this degeneration could be manifold, but does it overly matter? For once everyone is in agreement on an aspect of the 40k fluff!
That's odd. I'm pretty certain I don't agree, but maybe I'm wrong...
So what would you say makes the latter marines better than the former?
I didn't say they were better. I was simply disagreeing with the statement that they aren't "near as awesome".