3 minutes ago, thespaceinvader said:Just because something doesn't count as rerolling, doesn't mean it counts as rolling, or, if there is an interpretation that doesn't infinite loop, that one's correct.
Han is poorly worded, and has been known by this forum to be poorly worded since before 2e officially came out, for exactly the reason that it's designed to interact with non-attack rolls.
It could have trivially been worded to be less ambiguous by making it two separate abilities, one for attacks and one for everything else, but it wasn't.
"Correct" interpretation of intent or not, it is what the FAQed ability says it does and it needs to be fixed if it is not how they want Han to function.