I made this list and took on a simple two ISD I list and completely annihilated it. It plays so viciously I fear it may give hawk 134 a run for its money. For your consideration:

Faction: Rebel Alliance
Points: 400/400
Commander: Kyrsta Agate (com)

Assault Objective: Surprise Attack
Defense Objective: Capture the VIP
Navigation Objective: Solar Corona

[ flagship ] Starhawk-class Battleship Mark II (150 points)
- Kyrsta Agate (com) ( 20 points)
- Linked Turbolaser Towers ( 7 points)
- walex blizzex ( 5 points)
= 181 total ship cost

Starhawk-class Battleship Mark I (140 points)
- Local Fire Control ( 4 points)
- Linked Turbolaser Towers ( 7 points)
= 151 total ship cost

1 Green Squadron ( 12 points)
1 Shara Bey ( 17 points)
1 Tycho Celchu ( 16 points)
1 Ketsu Onyo ( 22 points)
= 67 total squadron cost

Looks nasty. Vulnerable to getting outflanked, perhaps? Or to an opponent picking off your squads and running away? Or just scoring a bunch off of objectives and declining to engage?

On 2/25/2020 at 10:22 PM, Cpt ObVus said:

declining to engage?

Can be a big threat to hawks, snipe a couple squads/small ship and then run away. Ditto upgrades like Palp (off), suppresser, jonus/ rhymer all combine to hurt hawks a lot, leaving their big point ships free to sail away.

I'd switch Green Squardon for Generics. This fleet doesn't really pose any need to have a bomber squadron. Especially figuring your sacrificing counter 2 for bomber.

9 minutes ago, Basile1902 said:

I'd switch Green Squardon for Generics. This fleet doesn't really pose any need to have a bomber squadron. Especially figuring your sacrificing counter 2 for bomber.

And then Ketsu could be replaced by Lando for a bit stronger anti-squadron punch

17 minutes ago, Cap116 said:

And then Ketsu could be replaced by Lando for a bit stronger anti-squadron punch

Though Ketsu does get a scatter and speed 4 compared to Lando. Trufully you could go either way.