Just now, Rocmistro said:I guess I meant more to assert it as a global fix.
I think it's fine to say "I'm the TO for this event, and as such, given the card's ambiguity, we will be playing Heavy Fire Zone as a long-range red-die interpretation", without necessarily asserting that as the objectively settled way that the card will be FAQ'd by FFG.
And you don’t consider it worthwhile to continue to assert a desire to attain FFFOPs ideal of a CONSISTENT competitive environment?