1 hour ago, Vondy said:I would prefer to just have studio canon (films and television shows) and apocrypha (everything else). Disney can license all manner of things as official products without slapping a big canon sticker. It keeps things clean and leaves the fans to their own devices. It only really matters if you are actually producing content for Disney. Otherwise, who cares?
The problems with that approach can be seen in the Star Trek franchise, which pretty much doesn't give two wet s###s about canon, not even within their own TV series. It was also how Lucasfilm originally handled things, which again lead to all sorts of contradictions and inconsistencies about events. After all, there were at least half a dozen different tales about how the Rebellion got their hands on the original Death Star plans long before Rogue One had so much as a first draft.
For better or worse, under Disney at least there's a greater degree of internal consistency amidst the various products, so you don't have several different people trying to re-tell the same story or creating contradicting accounts of various events. You obviously don't care much the same as Paramount doesn't care about internal consistency regarding Star Trek, but there's a fair number of Star Wars folks (many of whom don't themselves care about a dinky little RPG like this one) who do appreciate having that measure of internal consistency.