Saboteur's Map question

By SILENT FURY, in X-Wing Rules Questions

latest?cb=20191004194959

Since the C-ROC can only take one device, I am reading this like you can spend one Mine charge from your devices equiped to your entire squad. Is anyone else reading this card this way, or is it only one charge from the C-ROC's device?

The use of "each of your equipped Mine upgrades" is throwing me off and making me think its not only what's on the huge ship.

It is only what is equipped to the huge ship. When an upgrade says "you", or any other form of the word, it is referencing the ship it is equipped to.

RR Page 2:

CARD INTERPRETATION
Use of “You”
Many pilot and ship abilities use the word “you” to refer to the ship card’s
corresponding ship. Upgrade, damage, and condition cards that use the word
“you” refer to the ship to which the card has been dealt or equipped.
Card effects that use “you” always refer to the ship or remote, not the player.

eish.... I also thought I meant for the entire squad.

If its only the one device on the C-ROC itself the Saboteur's Map just goes onto the pile of junk Illicits... sigh. And here I thought it was actually 'n nice thing to play around with.

4 hours ago, Bort said:

eish.... I also thought I meant for the entire squad.

If its only the one device on the C-ROC itself the Saboteur's Map just goes onto the pile of junk Illicits... sigh. And here I thought it was actually 'n nice thing to play around with.

Its a chance for it to put its mine out there without it being restricted to its template or movement. Its not that bad.

.."each of your equipped Mine upgrades.."

They worded it like this for future proofing in case they added another huge ship with more than one device slot OR, they decided to add a 2nd to the C-Roc.

Or they release Mines that go in slots other than Payload...

22 minutes ago, thespaceinvader said:

Or they release Mines that go in slots other than Payload...

Anything is possible. Like when iron squadron used explosive cargo containers against larger ships.

9fda11a7ded247bd9dd81e4e92aae537.jpg

Well that is disappointing, but makes sense. I completely forgot about the "you" explanation. Thanks :)