Also a Lancer-Class just to its left and a U-wing right below that.

and... auzituck.

2 minutes ago, Cloaker said:

and... auzituck.

I wasn't sure about that one or the maybe-YT2400 in the top right...but there's DEFINITELY a resistance bomber and that A-wing looking-thin from the first trailer above the Ghost, too.

3 minutes ago, Cloaker said:

and... auzituck.

Maybe. It is a bit thin and tall to be a Auzituck.

A couple U-Wings and YT-2400s in the full shot as well.

Just now, Ablazoned said:

I wasn't sure about that one or the maybe-YT2400 in the top right...but there's DEFINITELY a resistance bomber and that A-wing looking-thin from the first trailer above the Ghost, too.

bottom left of Lancer. in the other clip it's as obvious as a wookiee's ****. wait a minute. never mind...

Looks more like someone put engines on the wing tips of a M-12 Kimogila than an Auzituck.

I very curious about the ship just behind and to the left (its back right) of the "Defender" class corvette on the far left of the shot.

Is that a ******* starfortess!?

Abandon ship, you poor bastards! Didn't you see the last movie!?

Feels like they're trying to canonize everything with one shot. Now they have ships that were in the movie for their licensees.

36 minutes ago, Frimmel said:

Feels like they're trying to canonize everything with one shot. Now they have ships that were in the movie for their licensees.

Nah, that’s not the reason. Purely to remind the true fans of everything they loved before. It’s all there to draw out those fanboy moments and play on those feelings.

Licensing has little to do with it, they have those already.

Edit: This is not to say anything about whether or not playing on those emotions is good or bad... I have my own opinions

56 minutes ago, ficklegreendice said:

Is that a ******* starfortess!?

Abandon ship, you poor bastards! Didn't you see the last movie!?

I mean, with proper support and tactics they'd probably be okay. I still blame Poe.

3 minutes ago, LagJanson said:

Nah, that’s not the reason. Purely to remind the true fans of everything they loved before. It’s all there to draw out those fanboy moments and play on those feelings.

Licensing has little to do with it, they have those already.

Edit: This is not to say anything about whether or not playing on those emotions is good or bad... I have my own opinions

Neither your (which I agree with in point of fact) nor my interpretation speak particularly well of the creators.

I don't think playing on emotion is such a way is "bad" so much as I just think it is artistically lazy. A subtle distinction certainly but worth making.

2 minutes ago, Frimmel said:

Neither your (which I agree with in point of fact) nor my interpretation speak particularly well of the creators.

I don't think playing on emotion is such a way is "bad" so much as I just think it is artistically lazy. A subtle distinction certainly but worth making.

It can be done well in a way that’s not lazy, but the piece needs to stand on its own and use those callbacks in subtle ways and not focus on them.

Example: Rogue One does it well with the Ghost. Rogue One does it poorly with Dr Evazan

My expectations are not high with the creative teams on the main trilogy here. I expect I’ll be entertained but not pleased with how everything fits together as an individual story, a trilogy and as part of the saga.

Just now, LagJanson said:

Example: Rogue One does it well with the Ghost. Rogue One does it poorly with Dr Evazan

Agreed. I think Rise of The Planet of The Apes is the best example of proper use of callbacks that we're talking about.

Bespin Cloud Car!

(Close to the centre of the image)

What is directly below the lancer? what is directly to the left of the lancer? Is it dr. aphras ship?

30 minutes ago, Redd9 said:

What is directly below the lancer? what is directly to the left of the lancer? Is it dr. aphras ship?

Hans freighter from TFS below?, Hammerhead to the left, Razorcrest to the lower left.

56 minutes ago, XPav said:

Hans freighter from TFS below?, Hammerhead to the left, Razorcrest to the lower left.

Not the Razorcrest. Too thin in the hull, engines and wings.

Yeah, I thought it was Razorscrest also, but the engines attach very differently and the thickness is off.

It looks like there's a Dornean Gunship between and below the Ghost and the Lancer.

1 hour ago, Hiemfire said:

Not the Razorcrest. Too thin in the hull, engines and wings.

Halo instead, maybe? SS-54 Assault Ship. Thinner wings but similar look.

2 minutes ago, CaptainJaguarShark said:

Halo instead, maybe? SS-54 Assault Ship. Thinner wings but similar look.

Maybe, the hull shape and engine size are off though.

8 hours ago, CaptainJaguarShark said:

I mean, with proper support and tactics they'd probably be okay. I still blame Poe.

Poe and crew escape, the FO shows up a minute later and blows the star fortresses to pieces (there’s no way the lumbering star fortresses make it back to the Raddus before the dreadnought kills the fleet).

OR the star fortresses make it back in time, but now you have an extra ship shooting at the resistance, draining shields and fuel faster,

OR you have another ship shooting at the transports when they attempt to leave, leading to more casualties.

The dreadnought had to go, and it had to go then. The resistance should have just had an unmanned starfortress hyperram it and kill it that way. But either way, #poedidnothingwrong

Let me know when they show a First Order Gunboat

It does look like a Baleen heavy freighter below (and behind) the Lancer pursuit craft. Also, it looks like the Falcon is about to block a Pelta as it moves into the center of the picture. I think there are another 4-5 Peltas lurking further back in the shot and a hammerhead or two. There's a Braha'tok/Dornean gunship next to the Baleen as well. They dug anything and everything up for this one.