Can someone explain the logic behind this? These two seem contradictory.
QuoteQ: If a ship attempts a purple action (such as a [barrel roll] or [boost] action) and fails the action, must it still spend the [force]?
A: Yes. A purple action's [force] cost is a "cost to attempt to perform [that] purple action" (see Actions) and is still paid even if the action fails.
Q: If Anakin Skywalker [Naboo Royal N-1] uses his pilot ability to barrel roll (note that this is not a [barrel roll] action) and fails, must he still spend the [force]?A: No. A barrel roll can fail in the same manner as a [barrel roll] action, but because Anakin's ability is not an action, the [force] cost is a cost to resolve the effect (which Anakin cannot do in the case of failure) rather than a cost to
attempt the action.
How is one the cost for the attempt, yet the other is not? Are they saying that if its an action, its a cost, if its not an action, its a resolution?