The main idea of this thread is to talk and get table experience on whether its properly possible to win with decent frequency (say 40%-60%) with a mid-Init pilot (I3 I4) vs a high-Init pilot (I5 I6).
This situation came up in a scenario play we did. I had an Ahsoka list + some generics vs a Kylo list + some generics. It happened that towards the end Ahsoka went up directly against Kylo. Even in this case, I had to flee with Ahsoka even though I've been playing for 3 years or so, vs an beginner on their 3rd match.
Now, first, in a 1v1, how many of you would be willing to gamble your tournament life on flying Ahsoka vs Kylo? Its not a "fair" match, and its not really meant to be - because often in real life play, situations of unfair circumstances happen very often. Now the issue though is are mid-Init pilots seriously simply fodder for high-Init? It feels that way at this point in 2.0-balance.
Play these matches against an equally skilled or higher skilled player piloting the higher Init ship. Please try these situations out in a real match.
Situation 1: Ahsoka 7B R2 (70) vs Kylo AdvOptics (80).
This match is decidedly unfair. Not only that but Ahsoka's points are obviously also meant to reflect a coordinate-esque tax. However, can you win here? Try it on the table.
Situation 2: Ahsoka 7B R2 Sense SpareParts (79) vs Kylo AdvOptics (80).
Sense helps out a huge deal here. Could you win this?
Situation 3: Mace 7B R2 Sense AfterBurners or SpareParts (80) vs Kylo AdvOptics (80).
Mace has a more solo type of ability. You could also swap out any of these upgrades for what you want, up to 80 points. Could you win this?
I think that being able to win 40% of the time in Situation 1 means there's some serious magic to be had here and with your flying. However I expect the typical success rate of most players (assuming equally skill opponents) to be around 20%.
Edited by Blail Blerg