10 hours ago, syrath said:You can't compare Legion with Warhammer. The latter is a game that first saw release on the 80s and at that time I never saw weekly releases.For a year one game I don't think Legion is doing too badly. Warhammer is a money sink IMO. If I was buying new units every week or every second week, I know I couldn't keep up with it. Also Warhammer has way more power creep than Legion. Yes you can play with that 5 year old army you got but competitive , you won't be, since you have to have the later units to stay relevant. Having the units you got out of the core box still be relevant 1 year down the line is a good thing , not a bad thing, but it does mean that people don't have to buy the latest releases.
Give the game another 20 years and then compare against how Warhammer is now, even then Legion would still be 10 years younger. If legion tried to keep up with the same schedule as Warhammer there would be a lot of stock left on the shelves, which is not good for the game . game
Xwing outsold warhammer in the FLGS and was listed the no1 wargame for a number of years FFG know what they are doing at least when it comes to scheduling releases (note that this no.1 spot is due to one thing only and that is Warhammer shops themselves are not considered FLGS and do not release their sales figures, I'm sure if they did WH would be no1 ,2 at least with WH40K and Age of Sigmar)
To compare, how many FFG shops do you see in the high street? In my local area Warhammer shops outnumber the amount of FLGS and are in more prime and accessible locations. IMO Warhammer is a game that forces you to buy the latest and greatest units because to stay competitive you have to , Legion doesn't do this, it happened a bit with Xwing as they didn't expect the success they got and hadn't planned for the growth they got and as a result had to rework the game to rebalance everything. The same may happen with Legion as again it has expanded organically beyond its original boundaries, example operatives were not planned when they I'd the core, but we're added early.
Legion and Warhamer will be natural competitors for as long as legion can keep up with GW. I get the GW has been along time, so they've had a while to figure out their release schedule. But, it shouldn't be difficult for FFG to make a big release during the holidays? It just seems like bad management.
Also, you don't need to buy every unit that comes out. I know collectors do, but the typical player do not and cannot afford every unit. It's different for 40K because there are so many factions and units, it's impossible.
I've been playing warhammer for a decade and sometimes there is power creep, sometimes there is not. It really depends on the unit and faction. I've played my Orks army for years and it's been viable through 4th-6th edition with minor changes. It's a stretch to say that the game forces you to buy the latest units to stay competitive.
I don't know if this fact is true, but even if it is, it's irrelevant due to online orders and the fact that GW has it's own stores. I do remember reading an article a couple months ago which had 40,000 has the #1 wargame out there in sales. Legion was #5 on the list. I don't remember if X-wing was on the list.
Imagine this:
September: Terrain
October: Core Set
November: None
December: AAT and Republic Tank + B2s and Phase 2s.
January: None
February: Cody + Duku + Terrain
Push selling stuff around the holidays. Around the time the new movie comes out. Seems like a good plan.
Edited by R3dReVenge