Are you able to change your manuever and then use Leia? Both are when revealing dial, so I assume you can pick and choose Kaydel and then Leia still triggers at the same step. Just want to be clear on this
Resistance Leia and Kaydel Connix
Seems good.
even though the wording on leia is terrible, it seems this should work no problems.
Both of the cards happen in the same timing window, so you'd get to choose the order of resolution, so it'd work.
It's almost as if they were designed to work together
I think there needs to be some clarification of "revealed maneuver" for a lot of these abilities. Does changing the dial then change the revealed maneuver? This language is different than other cards like Ved Foslo where you can execute a different maneuver than the one revealed, but the revealed maneuver stays the same. And then with Leia - what does "that" refer to? Does it refer to whatever the maneuver on the dial is currently, or does it refer to the initially revealed maneuver?
36 minutes ago, Jychuah said:I think there needs to be some clarification of "revealed maneuver" for a lot of these abilities. Does changing the dial then change the revealed maneuver? This language is different than other cards like Ved Foslo where you can execute a different maneuver than the one revealed, but the revealed maneuver stays the same. And then with Leia - what does "that" refer to? Does it refer to whatever the maneuver on the dial is currently, or does it refer to the initially revealed maneuver?
<Grumble grumble grumble> (some people really need to open up a bloody rule book)... Updated Rules Reference, in effect July 10th (Just before Wave 4 goes fully legal for competitive play), page 13 (Maneuver section).
Some abilities reference a ship’s revealed maneuver outside of that
ship’s activation. A ship’s revealed maneuver is the maneuver selected on
its dial, which remains faceup next to that ship’s ship card until the next
Planning Phase.
◊ If a ship’s dial is not revealed, or it was not assigned a dial that round,
that ship does not have a revealed maneuver.
Link to the PDF of the upcoming Rules Reference (it is available on FFG's Second Edition product page, as always):
Ah, I'm looking at RRG 1.03
5 hours ago, Hiemfire said:<Grumble grumble grumble> (some people really need to open up a bloody rule book)... Updated Rules Reference, in effect July 10th (Just before Wave 4 goes fully legal for competitive play), page 13 (Maneuver section).
Calm down. 1.04 hasn't been officially posted on the site yet so its not easy to find what you linked (because, you can only find it by that direct link) so not everyone will have seen the leaked one.
14 minutes ago, Lyianx said:Calm down. 1.04 hasn't been officially posted on the site yet so its not easy to find what you linked (because, you can only find it by that direct link) so not everyone will have seen the leaked one.
Take another look. It has been up on the 2.0 main site since the new points dropped... Like the new points the first word is "Upcoming".
On 6/30/2019 at 12:19 AM, Lyianx said:It's almost as if they were designed to work together
I think we thought that before on the scum tie but it wasn't the case unless im remembering wrong. I like to double check things too much lol
Edited by Gokuja0423 minutes ago, Gokuja04 said:I think we thought that before on the scum tie but it wasn't the case unless im remembering wrong. I like to double check things too much lol
foreman proach / overseer yushyn didn't work together, no. they do now, though, after the update of the replacement effects-sections about paying costs in the latest RR. i don't see how that's relevant here, though.
21 hours ago, meffo said:foreman proach / overseer yushyn didn't work together, no. they do now, though, after the update of the replacement effects-sections about paying costs in the latest RR. i don't see how that's relevant here, though.
Oh I didnt realize they changed it.
It was relevant to the comment i replied to because he saids its almost like they were designed to work together. Which we thought was true for the ties but they didn't, though i guess now they addressed it.