Hi

I think that the AT-RT should have weak armour and that its to cheap.

Not sure if nonsense or just a Poe... (Which of course is the definition of a Poe but still...)

.....

what?

what

57 minutes ago, Desidious said:

Hi

I think that the AT-RT should have weak armour and that its to cheap

Looks like a troll post to me, maybe I can take your post serious if you write some detailed arguments about why it is too strong...

or maybe they are new and only playing with box set and don't understand impact rules

12 minutes ago, Staelwulf said:

Looks like a troll post to me, maybe I can take your post serious if you write some detailed arguments about why it is too strong...

Judging by their profile I don’t believe they’re a troll. They are just not a strong English speaker. I disagree with their opinion, but flagging them as a troll seems a bit harsh/lynch mob-like.

It is a open vehicle and the driver is exposed = weak armour.

Thanks Kwatchi for not flaging me as a troll!!

It has 6 wounds for 55 points and the occupier tank is 4x times as large and only has 8 wounds!!

Only my thought!!

I tend to agree that the AT-RT is stronger than it really has any right to be. It honestly should have weak sides, like the Occupier, or just Armor X, rather than a blanket armor value. That said, the AT-RT was the best vehicle in the game for a long time, and was the only original one that was decent. I'm not exactly sure how it could have been "fixed" and still be playable though.

1 hour ago, Desidious said:

It is a open vehicle and the driver is exposed = weak armour.

Thanks Kwatchi for not flaging me as a troll!!

It has 6 wounds for 55 points and the occupier tank is 4x times as large and only has 8 wounds!!

Only my thought!!

Yes, but you MUST add a weapon upgrade to the AT-RT to make it worth offensively, so it ends up costing between 80 and 90 points.
On the other hand even if the tank has only 2 more HP, the AT-RT has 1/6 chances of defending damage while the tank has 3/6. That is a huge difference.
I'm not saying the AT-RT is not good (it actually is), but at least that it's not too good for it's cost in my opinion.

I dont think it's too good for the cost, but i dont get all the hate on the AT-RT...its a very viable option in my opinion since it has the same firepower as the cannon (when using rotary gun which is a must have IMO), is maneuverable with expert climber, and fairly survivable. Very worth the cost. Putting one on top of a piece of terrain overlooking part of the board can really shut down an opponents movements in a large area.

On paper it is good. People have a hard time making use of it in actual games.

RT is just fine the way it is. Imperial lists still shred them

It has 6+ save vs 4+ that the tank have. It's one of the few vehicle units that can fill several roles and not be too expensive.

Too Good, what have you been smoking?

ATRTs would be great if DLTs were not a thing. Stormtroopers will shred the thing without breaking a sweat.

It'll be interesting to see what happens with AT-RT's once Tauntauns are out.

The ATRT is a great vehicle, But even if it was too strong, they would still be able to Nerf it with expansions.

On 5/25/2019 at 8:54 AM, FearofaBlankPlanet said:

It'll be interesting to see what happens with AT-RT's once Tauntauns are out.

I don't think "never ever seeing it on the table ever again" will be that interesting.

20 minutes ago, arnoldrew said:

I don't think "never ever seeing it on the table ever again" will be that interesting.

And I hope that won't be the case.

The AT-RT can still accomplish things that Tauntauns can't (and vice versa), so we'll just have to see what happens post-release.

Still, I think it's ridiculous that the fully-armored AT-ST and Occupier tank have huge Weakspots, but the AT-RT, where the driver has a shirt for armor, doesn't.

21 minutes ago, costi said:

Still, I think it's ridiculous that the fully-armored AT-ST and Occupier tank have huge Weakspots, but the AT-RT, where the driver has a shirt for armor, doesn't.

Hey, that shirt is doing it’s best

The AT-RT should probably be armour 2, surge to defence.

6 hours ago, Jabby said:

Hey, that shirt is doing it’s best

I'm just wondering where the rest of my Rebels can get shirts of that quality.

1 hour ago, Alpha17 said:

I'm just wondering where the rest of my Rebels can get shirts of that quality.

Wallmart. Endor section.

7 hours ago, Senjius said:

Wallmart. Endor section.

Dang it, my Wal-Mart just switched over from Endor season to Tatooine. Guess I'll have to try next year.