I'm going progression style, and today opened Redhorn Gate. It introduces the Secrecy mechanic.
Whenever I open a new pack, I put at least one copy of each new card in one of my decks (I play 2 handed). That way, I force myself to learn the new cards instead of sticking with my old favorites. If I then lose the quest, I am free to go back to using whatever cards I want.
I recently finished the 3 Khazad Dum quests with 2 Dwarf-themed decks. All 6 heroes were Dwarves, and almost all of the allies (I couldn't resist Gandalf and a Northern Tracker or two).
I wanted to start the Dwarrowdelf cycle with similarly Dwarf-centric decks, but now Redhorn Gate adds Secrecy cards, and at least one Hobbit-specific card.
So, in order to use the new cards, I had to add at least one Hobbit, and then I realized that my Dwarves' starting threats were too high, so I started trying to find ways to reduce them, and then started looking at Denethor as a way to take advantage of one of the Secrecy cards, and then started thinking about 2 hero decks and by then was utterly overwhelmed by the number of changes I would need to make, so I stopped trying to deck build and started reading articles about Secrecy.
The problem is, most of the prominent Secrecy articles were written long after the Dwarrowdelf cycle. They, in fact, often state that Secrecy wasn't really viable "in the beginning" and only recently started becoming worthwhile, thanks to the increased card pool.
So I am wondering:
Should I try Secrecy now, "progression style" (which means limiting the cards to Dwarrowdelf and earlier), or should I save my attempts at Secrecy for a later cycle? If so, at what point does Secrecy become worth trying out?
NOTE: I'm not really into deck building (yet), but I don't want to copy other people's decks, so I'm not looking for specific card or deck advice. I'm just wondering if running a Secrecy deck (or two) with Dwarrowdelf-era cards would be fun... or frustrating.
Thanks!