Anakin & Plasma Torps

Padme & R2-C4

https://imgur.com/a/QJaGxUU

Here's an album of everything

So can Anakin do two barrel rolls a turn?

From a fluff perspective isn't the initiative a bit high on Padme?

Proto-defenders!

5 minutes ago, Frimmel said:

So can Anakin do two barrel rolls a turn?

From a fluff perspective isn't the initiative a bit high on Padme?

Yes, because only the one on his action bar is a barrel roll action. The other is just spinning. I’ve heard it’s a good trick. 😉

1 hour ago, svelok said:

https://imgur.com/a/QJaGxUU

Here's an album of everything

Is there a way to get Imgur to display better resolution images? When I load these pics, the fidelity is so bad as to be unreadable.

Autoblasters look like a great change from 1e. The auto damage element is largely gone, which is good, but there's still a chance for it if you can flank and get a crit result.

I still don't know if you'd want to bother with them on B-Wings, unless they turn out to be quite cheap, which is a shame as I really want to run B-Wings with the 'correct' armament.

But at least there's a chance they could benefit from them. I also like the potential for synergy with Marksmanship - the more things that make that card less terrible, the better.

Assuming these are 3 points or less, I'll definitely give them a go with Marksmanship Braylen. I could maybe stretch to 4, but that might start to be diminishing returns.

1 minute ago, GuacCousteau said:

Autoblasters look like a great change from 1e. The auto damage element is largely gone, which is good, but there's still a chance for it if you can flank and get a crit result.

I still don't know if you'd want to bother with them on B-Wings, unless they turn out to be quite cheap, which is a shame as I really want to run B-Wings with the 'correct' armament.

But at least there's a chance they could benefit from them. I also like the potential for synergy with Marksmanship - the more things that make that card less terrible, the better.

Assuming these are 3 points or less, I'll definitely give them a go with Marksmanship Braylen. I could maybe stretch to 4, but that might start to be diminishing returns.

Can you read the text? I can’t tell what it says beyond range 1-2 two dice?

2 Attack Die, Forward Arc. Range 1-2.

Attack: If the defender is in your (bullseye arc), roll 1 additional die. During the Neutralize Results step, if you not in the defenders (firing arc), (evade) results do not cancel (crit) results.

1 minute ago, XPav said:

2 Attack Die, Forward Arc. Range 1-2.

Attack: If the defender is in your (bullseye arc), roll 1 additional die. During the Neutralize Results step, if you not in the defenders (firing arc), (evade) results do not cancel (crit) results.

Might be questionable for B-Wings... Or at least ones without Advanced Sensors.

But I have a handful of Scyks that could use that, if it’s not too terribly pricey.

5 minutes ago, XPav said:

2 Attack Die, Forward Arc. Range 1-2.

Attack: If the defender is in your (bullseye arc), roll 1 additional die. During the Neutralize Results step, if you not in the defenders (firing arc), (evade) results do not cancel (crit) results.

Ew

That's a 0 point cannon to match jamming beams

Could not be more situational. It's almost 1st ed r3 levels of comedy

edit: nevermind, horribly misread
you get an additional die in your bullseye, you do not need the defender in your bullseye
that would've killed this card hard.

scyks gonna like this one

3 minutes ago, XPav said:

2 Attack Die, Forward Arc. Range 1-2.

Attack: If the defender is in your (bullseye arc), roll 1 additional die. During the Neutralize Results step, if you not in the defenders (firing arc), (evade) results do not cancel (crit) results.

Bwings with Gavin

1 hour ago, svelok said:

https://imgur.com/a/QJaGxUU

Here's an album of everything

Updated with Hyena pics

9 minutes ago, Phelan Boots said:

Can you read the text? I can’t tell what it says beyond range 1-2 two dice?

Imgur's mobile site has lousy compression, if you're on a phone.

Sigh, why did they make plasma torps nastier? I hope the’re stupid expensive.

this guy's slogan is my favorite prequel thing behind Arcs

On 4/30/2019 at 2:02 PM, FlyingAnchors said:

Sigh, why did they make plasma torps nastier? I hope the’re stupid expensive.

Nastier?

They changed it from R2-3 to R1-2 . They dropped a Die down to 3. Crits are canceled before hits. What part of that is Nastier?

My mistake it's R2-3

1 minute ago, ficklegreendice said:

this guy's slogan is my favorite prequel thing behind Arcs

Why is the droid bomber on Jaycris Tubbs’ base?

Just now, J1mBob said:

Why is the droid bomber on Jaycris Tubbs’ base?

Tubbs is a Cylon, confirmed

2 minutes ago, Danath "ATLAS" said:

Nastier?

They changed it from R2-3 to R1-2. They dropped a Die down to 3. Crits are canceled before hits. What part of that is Nastier?

Chances of My B-wings still losing all their shields: 80%

3 minutes ago, J1mBob said:

Why is the droid bomber on Jaycris Tubbs’ base?

Just to show the model. This was right after the demo match.

1 minute ago, FlyingAnchors said:

Chances of My B-wings still losing all their shields: 80%

Yeah B-Wings need a little help. I hoped autoblaster would do it but it seems otherwise

6 minutes ago, Danath "ATLAS" said:

Nastier?

They changed it from R2-3 to R1-2. They dropped a Die down to 3. Crits are canceled before hits. What part of that is Nastier?

They are still R2-3.

Hold up...

this thing is smaller than an arc?

that's some clown car bull

22 minutes ago, XPav said:

2 Attack Die, Forward Arc. Range 1-2.

Attack: If the defender is in your (bullseye arc), roll 1 additional die. During the Neutralize Results step, if you not in the defenders (firing arc), (evade) results do not cancel (crit) results.

Is it firing arc or forward arc?

9 minutes ago, Danath "ATLAS" said:

Nastier?

They changed it from R2-3 to R1-2. They dropped a Die down to 3. Crits are canceled before hits. What part of that is Nastier?