My X-34 card contains the following text, does yours?

Outrider X: You may equip up to X Outrider passengers. After you make a speed 3 move, roll one white defense die. On a [block] result, one of the Outriders falls off unless they have the "Spleemo T. Magnabutt" keyword.

Spleemo?

The X-34 outriders are totally Sonic&Tails.

I had barricada's installed for passenger safety 😛

Oooh ... barricada!

The party bus aint got time for safety!

While we’re at it, why does the Toyota Hilux of Star Wars get armor 2, while the Imperial StuG only gets armor 1?

I have no idea what a StuG is, but I can only assume it's to give Rebels hope.

51 minutes ago, FearofaBlankPlanet said:

I have no idea what a StuG is, but I can only assume it's to give Rebels hope.

It’s short version of the German word for assault gun, IE, a type of armored vehicle with no turret designed for infantry support.

the Toyota Hi-lux reference is in regards to the fact that the X-34 is a ‘technical’, IE, a civilian vehicle retrofitted with weapons.

Basically, the TX-225 is a built for purpose armored vehicle has the Armor keyword, but the X-34, an improvised vehicle asset, has ARMOR 2

3 hours ago, joewrightgm said:

Basically, the TX-225 is a built for purpose armored vehicle has the Armor keyword, but the X-34, an improvised vehicle asset, has ARMOR 2

It looks funny, sure, but the TX-225 also has red defense and +2 Hull. So in effect, I’d think much tankier still.

Edit: ah, they’ve clear this up below.

1 hour ago, joewrightgm said:

Basically, the TX-225 is a built for purpose armored vehicle has the Armor keyword, but the X-34, an improvised vehicle asset, has ARMOR 2

As funny as it looks, isn't Armor (which is different than Armor 1) actually better than Armor 2?

1 hour ago, Darth 2Face said:

As funny as it looks, isn't Armor (which is different than Armor 1) actually better than Armor 2?

Yes, Armor negates ALL hits.

Armor X only negates X number of hits. (1=1 hit; 2=2 hits canceled, etc.)

3 hours ago, joewrightgm said:

It’s short version of the German word for assault gun, IE, a type of armored vehicle with no turret designed for infantry support.

Right, when I saw StuG and Armour 1 I assumed it was something to do with Dewbacks

Thanks for the explanation

2 hours ago, manoftomorrow010 said:

Yes, Armor negates ALL hits.

Armor X only negates X number of hits. (1=1 hit; 2=2 hits canceled, etc.)

Ah, see kids his is why reading comprehension is essential; thank you!

6 hours ago, FearofaBlankPlanet said:

Right, when I saw StuG and Armour 1 I assumed it was something to do with Dewbacks

Thanks for the explanation

Hmmm ... can the StuG transport a Dewback?

41 minutes ago, DewbackScout said:

Hmmm ... can the StuG transport a Dewback?

Right, so I had no idea what a StuG is, but I know Dewbacks have Armour 1. Hence my assumption that StuG was some obscure acronym relating to armoured lizards 😛

8 hours ago, DewbackScout said:

Hmmm ... can the StuG transport a Dewback?

If it counts as trooper unit, what I doubt, it can.

3 hours ago, Staelwulf said:

If it counts as trooper unit, what I doubt, it can.

"Creature Trooper" on the card.