15 hours ago, Schmoozies said:In fairness in the old game at launch the Crab/Shadowlands alliance was just a fact of life and was played up as the Crab having grown tired of seeing the clans bicker among themselves while ignoring the real threat to the south having said enough was enough and that they would use every tool at their disposal (including tainted troops) to beat the rest of the clans into submission and unite the empire under one banner to finally organize an effort to beat Fu Leng back to Jigoku where he belonged.
The origianl flavor for the Crab deck set it out "For Generations the Crab have held back the horrors of the Shadowlands, but times have changed. Now they have embraced that which they have fought against for so long, turning their mastery of warfare against the Empire they swore to protect.
“You are always blind to your truest enemy, for he is behind your eyes.”
They were in a redemption arc from the start and as the war progressed they fell further and further from their intention until they hit a do or die point and had to turn back from the edge.
and I didn't like it then. It rang false for me and I know I'm not alone. There's gotta be a better way to pull that off if they want to revisit that story line. It's a weird bump at the beginning of the Crab's history in the old lore that needs smoothing. I'm honestly nervous about how that handle that going forward because if done incorrectly it would greatly diminish my enthusiasm for the Crab Clan and probably the whole new story continuity.
Its a more nuanced concern than not wanting the Crab to be portrayed as antagonists. I don't mind them being antagonists. I expect it. Kisada should be angry at the other clans to the point of military action and potentially regicide. Yori should be corrupted by the Shadowlands because that's what Yori does. It's a matter of how it was executed and what it means for the clan's identity.
Edited by phillos