Give Maul Dooku crew for 4 force. Can you do normal attack, then follow up for 2 more attacks?

Nope.

The rules reference (p. 6) says you're limited to one bonus attack per round.

currently all ships are limited to just 1 bonus attack (outside of their normal attack) per round.

Just now, Yearfire said:

Nope.

The rules reference (p. 6) says you're limited to one bonus attack per round.

Sniped

3 hours ago, Yearfire said:

Nope.

The rules reference (p. 6) says you're limited to one bonus attack per round.

Rules reference also says "Each ship can drop or launch only one device per round.", yet here we are.

5 minutes ago, Lyianx said:

Rules reference also says "Each ship can drop or launch only one device per round.", yet here we are.

Please just stop.

8 minutes ago, Lyianx said:

Rules reference also says "Each ship can drop or launch only one device per round.", yet here we are.

And something has changed...? because I don't get it.

2 hours ago, Shwarrz said:

2 hours ago, Lyianx said:

Rules  reference also says "Each ship can drop or launch only one device per round.", yet here we are.  

And something has changed...? because I don't get it.

It's a rules-lawyer thing. Don't worry about it if you don't have to.

3 hours ago, Shwarrz said:

And  something has changed...? because I don't get it. 

FFG made a (bad) ruling on Paige Tico and Deathfire in the Official Rulings thread.

Yes but they made it for THOSE TWO SHIPS ONLY and yet Lyianx goes into EVERY rules thread now applying it as a general rule to everything ever in the game.

2 hours ago, InterceptorMad said:

Yes but they made it for THOSE TWO SHIPS ONLY and yet Lyianx goes into EVERY rules thread now applying it as a general rule to everything ever in the game.

Unfortunately, I agree with Lyianx that the way the ruling is worded makes it useable as precedent for anything. That being said, I disagree with bringing it up in every thread. Some day FFG will (hopefully) fix their mistake, and when they do all of these posts will still be in every thread continuing to confuse people looking for simple answers.

At the same time, calling out that this particular call makes no sense and is going to confuse even more player, is probably the right thing to do to have FFG pay attention to it and fix it as soon as possible. Because as it stands, it's true that the situation between Paige Tico dropping 4 bombs, and say, quickdraw making four bonus attack, is very similar in nature and the only difference is found in an errata on the forum, and there seem to be no logic behind the difference as much as '' because I say so''. That, to me, sound even more confusing!

For me, FFG's word is always law. So if they say CERTAIN ships only can do something, then that's how you take it. Those ships/upgrades do what FFG says they do, the rest follow the rules.

For me, this is no different than a ship card saying you can do an action when stressed. It's just FFG saying it instead of card text.

3 hours ago, InterceptorMad said:

For me, FFG's word is always law. So if they say CERTAIN ships only can do something, then that's how you take it. Those ships/upgrades do what FFG says they do, the rest follow the rules.

For me, this is no different than a ship card saying you can do an action when stressed. It's just FFG saying it instead of card text.

Yep.

Their world, we just live in it. It isn't a wrong ruling if we don't like it, just a rule/interaction/whatever that we don't like.

I also have 0 problems whatsoever with this ruling, at all. They are distinct abilities, and the next rules update could easily include "...during the systems phase" at the end of the offending device restriction text. Or once per round. Or whatever they want.