Just a rules musing..
This past weekend I found I had been interpreting the process of un-stunning a creature wrong. I was under the impression that removing stun was its own 'thing'. So you couldn't fight with a creature that was stunned, you had to un-stun it first. But a situation came up where my opponent used a Gauntlet of Command to un-stun a non-Brobnar creature. I argued that it wouldn't work as the Gauntlet specifies "fight" and that to un-stun was a separate "use" of a creature. The Creature could not fight as it was stunned. I was overruled by the TO in that any action taken with a stunned creature un-stuns it.
So does this mean if a creature with Rocket Boots was stunned the owner could call for the creature to reap to un-stun it, then ready and reap again with the boots? The above ruling seems to imply that it could. But does it count as 'reaping' if it just gets un-stunned?