Don’t answer ovi.

Surely the nature of the fruit handed to each person ought only be revealed by the true vendor, not the vender. Fruit revelations identify the giver (who is blessing), rather than the recipient (the blessed).

7 minutes ago, LTD said:

Don’t answer ovi.

Surely the nature of the fruit handed to each person ought only be revealed by the true vendor, not the vender. Fruit revelations identify the giver (who is blessing), rather than the recipient (the blessed).

🤣

12 minutes ago, LTD said:

Don’t answer ovi.

Surely the nature of the fruit handed to each person ought only be revealed by the true vendor, not the vender. Fruit revelations identify the giver (who is blessing), rather than the recipient (the blessed).

If the Fruit Vendor has potential for a negative impact on town shouldn't it be out there?

Are we certain that a specific type of fruit is always stated upon receipt by the blessed?

All this fruit talk is interesting

I would suggest not revealing fruit received as well

2 minutes ago, Matt3412 said:

I would suggest not revealing fruit received as well

This is what I suggested!

Or are you saying “as well” as in you are agreeing with me?

Only the vendor should reveal the identity of fruit and its recipient. Then the vendee(s) can corroborate, providing a full harvest of truth.

Let us push someone.

@Lord Preyer - justify your continued existence before I vote thee into obscurity!

Lol as well is what I mean Ltd

Then say what you mean, Matt3412, if that is even your real name, which I doubt!

As of right now LP actually does seem suspicious to me

##vote @Lord Preyer

Just now, LTD said:

Then say what you mean, Matt3412, if that is even your real name, which I doubt!

Dude that quote says as well lol

Actually do we all still believe in LYNCH ALL LIERS??

ABSOLUTELY

I hate Cavaliers

24 minutes ago, Lord Preyer said:

Are we certain that a specific type of fruit is always stated upon receipt by the blessed?

It appears father has had some memory loss issues

Something he ate maybe?

Ebon said Ovi ate 'rotten' fruit.

I didn't realise the spanish dined that way, but I know times are tough cos of the EU n that...

I think ebon had made a comment on one of or transitions that the food had gone bad so that makes sense

8 hours ago, EbonHawk said:

Anyway eat up because we've got a long trip ahead to the Restaurant at the End of the Universe, which is just as well as it seems the fruit stores have turned mouldy, I hope no one ate any last night, they may be feeling odd this morning!

The food went bad

seems the Ignore function on this site fluctuates somewhat...

ok that makes more sense.

I guess I feel somewhat better that some crazy **** isn't coming my way cos of my dietary choices in this one

1 minute ago, PodRacer said:

seems the Ignore function on this site fluctuates somewhat..

?

2 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

ok that makes more sense.

I guess I feel somewhat better that some crazy **** isn't coming my way cos of my dietary choices in this one

did you read the day start post pod

On 12/5/2018 at 12:29 PM, Lord Preyer said:

I read GNIPs as Town.

I read Cal as probably Town.

I do not favour lynching Hero.

I am curious about Ovi.

1 hour ago, Lord Preyer said:

Sorry I missed the hammer. Thought I had more time (and I should have pre-announced as I previously have when I think I’m going to be out of action - sorry). I would have been there in the pinch to favour a GNIP lynch over no lynch but freely admit that I read him as Town throughout so it would have been a vote against my own inclination - phew? I guess? ... So... welcome back GNIP! Will try and do this better against/with you this time!

I am suspicious of @Bertie Wooster who is posting the kind of posts you post if you might be Scum and want to keep things ticking along. But before you even say it Bertie - yes! Mine too fall afoul of that standard in some instances , but all I can do is call the ball based on what I do know ( I’m Town) and don’t know (who you might be). I’m not voting BW yet but I am flagging it and will start examining this approach accordingly.

Well, since you mentioned it, yes I do find your posts sort of unusual in this game (see above), since I'm used to you calling for a VoteZap over a no-lynch scenario, and at the end of D3 you didn't vote for anyone even after Ebon warned us of two hours left.

However, I feel that your non-committal posts seem more like a Traitor than a true scum, since after all the Traitor could switch sides at any moment (and thus don't want to get scum lynched), so I am hesitant to vote for you.

If you are a Traitor, I suspect Caldias may be scum. This would also fit ovi's theory of arsonist / scum in the GNIP / Caldias duo, and may help explain why Caldias was hesitant to vote for GNIP (The theory, as I understood it, is that arsonist and scum would be hesitant to vote for each other, thinking the other is town, and thus casting suspicion on themselves next day).

2 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

5 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

seems the Ignore function on this site fluctuates somewhat..

?

#forumbantz

2 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

5 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

ok that makes more sense.

I guess I feel somewhat better that some crazy **** isn't coming my way cos of my dietary choices in this one

did you read the day start post pod

Apparently I caught the bit about Ovi getting attacked but missed the bit about the fruit, between Matt and I, I'm thinking we got it now1

36 minutes ago, Bertie Wooster said:

Well, since you mentioned it, yes I do find your posts sort of unusual in this game (see above), since I'm used to you calling for a VoteZap over a no-lynch scenario, and at the end of D3 you didn't vote for anyone even after Ebon warned us of two hours left.

However, I feel that your non-committal posts seem more like a Traitor than a true scum, since after all the Traitor could switch sides at any moment (and thus don't want to get scum lynched), so I am hesitant to vote for you.

If you are a Traitor, I suspect Caldias may be scum. This would also fit ovi's theory of arsonist / scum in the GNIP / Caldias duo, and may help explain why Caldias was hesitant to vote for GNIP (The theory, as I understood it, is that arsonist and scum would be hesitant to vote for each other, thinking the other is town, and thus casting suspicion on themselves next day).

Great post.

After re reading I'm pretty sure LP is just fishing to out the FV too.

The other slot I consider to have traitor equity is GSIPS, I wanna re read the last post hero made for clarity..

On 12/5/2018 at 1:52 AM, Herowannabe said:

If we can’t find a replacement for me I have an idea on how I can still contribute somewhat- I’ll post it closer to the end of the cycle, so I’d like to request that nobody hammers- at least not for the next 14 hours or so.

This