okay in about 15 mins i'm going to have change my vote to one of the trains so i can at lest have some meaningful input before i log off.

I invited earlier I believe.

##vote LTD

For the silence

*unvoted

1.5 hours left guys, need to pick up this last hour before night hits

Just now, EbonHawk said:

1.5 hours left guys, need to pick up this last hour before night hits

so spare cal for the day? are you sure?

##vote @Caldias

im sorry but unfortunately ltd is not talking... and i dont want to kill him just for that today

Just now, Constantine Valdor said:

so spare cal for the day? are you sure?

I'm never sure on Cal.

But LTD being awol for near 2 days helps no one

1 minute ago, Matt3412 said:

##vote @Caldias

im sorry but unfortunately ltd is not talking... and i dont want to kill him just for that today

I take it you wish to unvote Podracer first then?

I'm gonna sleep, my vote's saying on Cal

4 minutes ago, Constantine Valdor said:

I'm gonna sleep, my vote's saying on Cal

Super helpful, thanks

Vote Count Plz mod

##vote LTD

Reasons as previously stated. I’d rather keep people alive that I have a record on.

1 hour ago, EbonHawk said:

As explained, I can see the reasons behind voting cal and how he's posted, but D1 I'd rather let him have another day to evaluate proper, as if he isn't scum he's a great asset.

Why doesn't he get one with you?

gunna answer pod?

1 minute ago, EbonHawk said:

gunna answer pod?

already did, said I'm not seeing the 'asset' so far.

Just now, PodRacer said:

already did, said I'm not seeing the 'asset' so far.

as said before, the only people who can see an assest D1 is scum, in their scum mate..

But surely a talkative player is more of an asset going forward than an absent one? D1 is always a guess but not seeing someone as an asset D1 is not a reason for voting.. especially when I only said Cal would be an asset if not scum something we can only really find out by giving him another day to talk...

Your game seems a little odd so far

1 minute ago, PodRacer said:

already did, said I'm not seeing the 'asset' so far.

Fair enough, but how am I seeming as more of a detriment than the other players? Especially the ones that aren't saying anything?

I think after last D1 game my policy on people that don't post is clear.

However 'my record speaks for itself' is as close to a soft as we have had in this one which makes me think twice on LTD

~~Landed~~

++Processing...Processing...++

Just now, PodRacer said:

I think after last D1 game my policy on people that don't post is clear.

However 'my record speaks for itself' is as close to a soft as we have had in this one which makes me think twice on LTD

~~REQUEST clarity on “my record speaks for itself”?~~

~~Meaning? Conjecture mode welcome~~

On 11/18/2018 at 10:14 PM, LTD said:

TX-42 - my record speaks for itself. I am no traitor to our illustrious purpose.

Those amongst you who have broken subroutines will be discovered and removed.

that LP

his 2nd and last post. (including his RC)

++VoteZap remains on possible Silent Running/potential Republic-sympathizer unit @LTD pending active participation of that unit++

++Sufficient @Herowannabe Concern overidden by Newbie Protection Protocols Only. D1 only++

~~REQUEST: clarity/summary on @Caldias case by prosecuting units as this appears tangential/insufficient at this time~~

Enough to make me believe that he is a sub optimal lynch d1, will be happy to push him d2 for info tho