A Tactical Malfunction [MAFIA]

By The Jabbawookie, in Star Wars: Armada Off-Topic

CV's a bad lynch with two cop claims.

My issue is the sanity of the cops, I can buy a team of LP/Ebon LP/Gnip I think alternate night sane/Insane results could be a thing

Maybe Im blind to Scum!Ebon but this seems like quite high intensity scum play. I will also be dissapointed the Mob didn't bring this to my attention D1 😃

3 hours ago, clontroper5 said:

Oh he is definitely one of my suspects, I just think we need to resolve @Herowannabe s stuff first

how would solving hero lead you back to Cv?

5 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

CV's a bad lynch with two cop claims.

My issue is the sanity of the cops, I can buy a team of LP/Ebon LP/Gnip I think alternate night sane/Insane results could be a thing

Maybe Im blind to Scum!Ebon but this seems like quite high intensity scum play. I will also be dissapointed the Mob didn't bring this to my attention D1 😃

whats LP get us?

Hero's sanity

++Comms: @clontroper5 ++

~~QUERY: in your scenario if VoteZap of @Herowannabe resulted in Hero unit being proved loyal CIS how would this aid you in understanding loyalty of this unit and @EbonHawk ?~~

4 minutes ago, Lord Preyer said:

++Comms: @clontroper5 ++

~~QUERY: in your scenario if VoteZap of @Herowannabe resulted in Hero unit being proved loyal CIS how would this aid you in understanding loyalty of this unit and @EbonHawk ?~~

Theoretically we would know what kind of cop he is and therefore what the anti-town results from you and ebon would mean. It should prove your innocence or guilt

7 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

how would solving hero lead you back to Cv?

There not connected and I never implied they were

Just now, clontroper5 said:

There not connected and I never implied they were

that's what i wanted to know weather Cv was a read today or would change..

1 minute ago, clontroper5 said:

Theoretically we would know what kind of cop he is and therefore what the anti-town results from you and ebon would mean. It should prove your innocence or guilt

if we get to know what cop he is, is a big gamble but if it proves me innocent sorry LP

##unvote

##vote LP

++LOGIC PATHWAY: DueProcessOfEliminationProtocol++

++>Do not VoteZap a possible CopBot (presuming @Herowannabe = Insane and @Madaghmire = paranoid but both therefore loyal CIS...??)++

++>Do not VoteZap a possible RepairBot (presuming @PodRacer = Bodyguard unit and @Caldias = medical droid)++

++>Do not VoteZap @EbonHawk as that unit is likely CIS loyal as it was also scanned as disloyal by Hero unit++

++>Remaining viable VoteZaps: @Constantine Valdor (See previous case files - BUT case undermined by lack of Turbo when that unit had opportunity) or @clontroper5 (cf. Scummarining? But that unit did UnVoteZap when requested in face of Turbo threat)++

~~QUERY: Viable alternative targets?~~

++Processing...processing...++

2 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

that's what i wanted to know weather Cv was a read today or would change..

if we get to know what cop he is, is a big gamble but if it proves me innocent sorry LP

##unvote

##vote LP

~~CHALLENGE: this unit questions efficacy of any strategem that relies upon a VoteZap to clear any other unit(s) due to proven “experimental” nature of current crisis - particularly the >50% likelihood of continuing uncertainty of Paranoid Versus Insane CopBots~~

~~ALTERNATIVE STRATEGEM: VoteZap only those units you actually suspect of being corrupted~~

1 minute ago, Lord Preyer said:

++LOGIC PATHWAY: DueProcessOfEliminationProtocol++

++>Do not VoteZap a possible CopBot (presuming @Herowannabe = Insane and @Madaghmire = paranoid but both therefore loyal CIS...??)++

++>Do not VoteZap a possible RepairBot (presuming @PodRacer = Bodyguard unit and @Caldias = medical droid)++

++>Do not VoteZap @EbonHawk as that unit is likely CIS loyal as it was also scanned as disloyal by Hero unit++

++>Remaining viable VoteZaps: @Constantine Valdor (See previous case files - BUT case undermined by lack of Turbo when that unit had opportunity) or @clontroper5 (cf. Scummarining? But that unit did UnVoteZap when requested in face of Turbo threat)++

~~QUERY: Viable alternative targets?~~

++Processing...processing...++

You see while YOU have information about the situation non of us do. And there also is no guarantee that Hero isn't Scum, Either 1.) He is a loyal cop at which point we have identified 2 scum which is in all likelihood everyone. And then town easily wins.

2.) He is a backwards cop that gives opposite reads in which case we have like 4-5 (all but) confirmed town and it makes it pretty easy to guess the other Suspects.

3.) His reads cannot be trusted at which point he isn't a useful cop anyway.

With all do respect you are working with extra information that the rest of us don't have, namely you know if Hero is accurate or not. We don't and Realistically town needs to find out at some point if that stuff is good or not in order to win. Frankly I was leaning towards you guys being town which is the why I voted Hero instead.

4 minutes ago, Lord Preyer said:

~~CHALLENGE: this unit questions efficacy of any strategem that relies upon a VoteZap to clear any other unit(s) due to proven “experimental” nature of current crisis - particularly the >50% likelihood of continuing uncertainty of Paranoid Versus Insane CopBots~~

~~ALTERNATIVE STRATEGEM: VoteZap only those units you actually suspect of being corrupted~~

Ok good point

##unvote

##vote @Lord Preyer

++Comms: @clontroper5 ++

~~Statement: kudos on excellent deduction circuit. Because this unit has “extra information” (namely 100% knowledge that this unit is CIS loyal) this unit is scouting for actual targets as @Herowannabe appears a lower priority target. However, this unit accepts that that same position/logic does not hold for other units.++

~~STATEMENT: compliment in last transmission was posited prior to @clontroper5 VoteZap~~

++INTERNAL: run programme Synth-emotion TragicIrony++

2 minutes ago, Lord Preyer said:

~~STATEMENT: compliment in last transmission was posited prior to @clontroper5 VoteZap~~

++INTERNAL: run programme Synth-emotion TragicIrony++

You see I have 0 EVIDENCE!! I found a way to find evidence so I am pushing for it. I would recommend if you are clean push for a vote on Hero and PROVE IT. Pushing for a CV vote is just smoke and mirrors from my perspective.

sorry LP, need to vote somebody before I sleep, already 1.30 here

## vote @Lord Preyer

Only in Death, does Duty Ends 🦅

1 minute ago, Constantine Valdor said:

sorry LP, need to vote somebody before I sleep, already 1.30 here

## vote @Lord Preyer

Only in Death, does Duty Ends 🦅

~~STATEMENT: understandable. My compliments and hopes for increasingly accurate targeting in the combat cycles to come~~

##Vote @Constantine Valdor

is that hammer?

L-1

I guess its claim time LP

++TERMINAL REFLECTIONS++

~~STATEMENT: this unit is classified as Vanilla Town—

~~STATEMENT: this unit strongly advises against trying to mathematically ‘solve’ this scenario with VoteZaps to ‘clear’ suspects.~~

~~STATEMENT: this unit suspects @clontroper5 @Constantine Valdor and, to a lesser % @Caldias ~~

~~STATEMENT: farewell~~

++POSTSCRIPT++

~~STATEMENT: “Neat” 👿 🖖🏻 ~~

1 minute ago, Lord Preyer said:

++POSTSCRIPT++

~~STATEMENT: “Neat” 👿 🖖🏻 ~~

Clarification on meaning?

On 9/14/2018 at 3:08 PM, Gengis Jon said:

##vote @Lord Preyer — Usage of the word “neat” here is what really draws my suspicion. Who even uses this word?! People who are trying sound innocent, that’s who.

1 minute ago, The Jabbawookie said:

Was he scum that game?