I broke down the different investigators into different stat line categories for discussion:
12 stats/14 HH
Skids, Agnes, Daisy, Mateo, Finn, Leo, Marie, Minh, Norman, Roland, Sefina, Silas, Ursula, Wendy, Yorrick
12 stats/15 HH
Jenny, Rex, Zoey, Jim
13 stats/14 HH
Akachi, Mark
11 stats/15 HH
Carolyn
Special Cases:
Calvin, Lola and Ashcan
I really want to talk about why these small variations exist.
First off, Carolyn, this isn't to weird for me, -1 stats for +1 health/sanity seems like a decent tradeoff.
I am still perplexed as to why the Dunwich line gets +1 to their health/sanity. Sure they don't have a secondary class, but I don't understand why that is much of an disadvantage. All the roles have good cards. Plus the 5 card splash makes up a lot of ground. Their signature cards are good and their sig weaknesses are not out of line with the core investigators. Even their abilities and elder sign abilities are good/synergistic. Okay Jenny's Elder Sign ability isn't good, but her ability is out of the park.
Onto Mark and Akachi. I sort of get Mark as Sophie can give him a -1 to all stats and/or it allows Sophie to boost his 3s to a 5. Akachi though I am not getting at all. Again, her sig cards are not weaker than others and her ability and elder sign is good as well. Plus she has decent deck building options (not a secondary class but still).
I get most of the one offs. Lola is weird. Having a large card pool is one thing. But having only 12 in health/sanity is rough and her special ability is basically a weakness/way to mitigate a weakness. Don't get me wrong, I like the one class at a time situation, I just don't get why she couldn't be 7/7 instead of 6/6.
Maybe its just my take that more options in deck construction do not necessarily mean a more powerful investigator.
Thoughts?