Jekothalep said:

Even the picture is better...

Eh...strength gain again...bleh...

Very few cards have made strength gain playable w/o a second effect.

Again, this card has made me decide to run my Night's Watch deck out of Stark. Say what you will about STR boosts, but I like them and use them.

I also wish they would reprint or remake Don't Give In.

Nope, "Frozen Solid" didn't have the "non-limited" restriction before, but other than that looks like the same card and one I think Stark needs to have a chance against all the negative attachment hate out there. Thing I always liked about this card is it also doubles for location control as necessary.

Frozen Solid looks so good in the new templating. I was hoping that this card would return.

ASoIaFfan said:

Actually, one very big difference in this one: anyone else notice the "House Stark only?"

ktom said:

I was SOOOOO excited for some good location/attachment hate. and then I saw that. I cried. I don't really understand the change.

Yes, noticed the "house Stark only" as well. Sorry I didn't point that out in my previous post. I was focusing on its effect and not who's house could play it. I like it as "house Stark only" though, so that change doesn't bother me. Even though the older versions could be used in any house, I only ran it in my Stark decks anyway for thematic reasons.

Stag Lord said:

This is a big, big deal for me. I could ahve been more specifci - I rna it out of House in TARG. it was one of the best location control effects around. Thsi version is definteily toned down with teh hosue only and the limited restriction, but I think it fits the LCG mode nicely, and is probably more approraitely costed in this iteration.

LetsGoRed said:

you're reaching the wrong way....King robb protects himself from burn much better than stannis does....

I hope making it house Stark Only means more in house location and/or attachment control for all houses (I can dream....)