2 minutes ago, The Jabbawookie said:Really though my problem is never seeing the New Republic, the Rebellion's primary goal, having any positive effect on the galaxy. There's nothing in the films that shows us it's worth it; Canto Bight sure isn't inspiring. The storyline focuses on the fight itself, and what they're fighting against, but not what they fight for.
My issue with the ST, and we're veering way off topic here, is this. At the end of Return of the Jedi the Empire is overthrown, the Sith are defeated, the Rebellion (presumably) is restoring peace and justice to the galaxy in the form of the New Republic, the Jedi return to guard that peace, Luke fulfills his destiny, and Han and Leia get their happy ending. Now, to create a sequel you need drama, so at least some of that has to be undone in order to create that drama. But the sequels undid ALL of it. The Empire wasn't defeated, it just hid for a while, not all the sith were destroyed, the New Republic failed totally, the Jedi remain gone, Luke rejects his destiny and turns his back on the galaxy, Han and Leia split and, in fact, are LITERALLY reset to their roles before the OT.
If they had just let SOME of the triumphs of the OT actually stick. The Empire isn't totally gone, but the New Republic is diligently striving to free the rest of the galaxy. There are still Sith plotting in the shadows, but now there are new (inexperienced) Jedi to oppose them. Luke isolates himself, not because he's a bitter, broken man, but because he has become so idolized its starting to resemble worship (think G'Kar at the end of B5). Han and Leia's kid has become the enemy of the universe, but the two of them are struggling through it and still in love with each other.
Instead, the entire set up they actually went with basically says "all the conflict, heroism, and striving in the movies you loved was pointless, nothing at all came of it".
Anyway, extra galactic invaders as a new faction,
I don't hate the generic idea, but it seems like lazy writing and, as others have said, strongly resembles the Vong. Those drawbacks can be overcome, but until they are, best to keep it out of the game.
On the other hand, I have never liked that they created the Chiss either. Thrawn should have remained an enigma, with it never being revealed where he came from or who his species is. Much like Yoda. By giving him and his species a back story, it destroys the mystique around the character. Plus the massively irritating but very predictable Star Wars tendency of modeling an entire culture off a single individual, so of course the Chiss were cold, calculating, moderately artistic and problem solvers with a large, strong military.
