In 2.0 they have 1 agility. I know that the whold pack has a lot of error cards but I am shocked this hasn’t been brought up yet. I mean I probably just haven’t see someone post about it yet.

4 minutes ago, Sir13scott said:

In 2.0 they have 1 agility. I know that the whold pack has a lot of error cards but I am shocked this hasn’t been brought up yet. I mean I probably just haven’t see someone post about it yet.

No they dont...

6 minutes ago, HolySorcerer said:

No they dont...

So are the entries for the various renegade U-Wings that can be found on this site http://www.infinitearenas.com/xw2browse/# false then?

1 minute ago, Hiemfire said:

So are the entries for the various renegade U-Wings that can be found on this site http://www.infinitearenas.com/xw2browse/# false then?

Yes, those were pulled from outdated images from ffg.

2 minutes ago, Hiemfire said:

So are the entries for the various renegade U-Wings that can be found on this site http://www.infinitearenas.com/xw2browse/# false then?

The copies of the cards I own show 2 agility for all the 2.0 ships.

I own an 'error pack'. All the U-wings have 2 agility.

Agility 2 is correct for a U wing in 2.0

I think that in the preview they had 1 agility and then were corrected to 2 when they were realeased.

I’ll update the card browser tonight to point to non-FFG images, which in this case will be more up-to-date than the FFG provided images... ?

1 hour ago, J1mBob said:

I’ll update the card browser tonight to point to non-FFG images, which in this case will be more up-to-date than the FFG provided images... ?

There are a few other cards with discrepancies as well. The Slave 1 title and Edrio are the ones that immediately jump to mind.

14 minutes ago, HolySorcerer said:

There are a few other cards with discrepancies as well. The Slave 1 title and Edrio are the ones that immediately jump to mind.

I’m under the possibly incorrect impression that the “correct” Slave I card applies a stress. Is this true?

1 minute ago, J1mBob said:

I’m under the possibly incorrect impression that the “correct” Slave I card applies a stress. Is this true?

There is no official word, but the most recent promo cards for the title do not grant stress. Personally based off of this info and the price of the title I would say the stress free version is the final.

1 hour ago, HolySorcerer said:

There is no official word, but the most recent promo cards for the title do not grant stress. Personally based off of this info and the price of the title I would say the stress free version is the final.

Thanks for your help trying to figure out which one is the real one!

The Firespray preview article dated July 2nd has an external link for the Slave I title instead of the usual pop-up for card images. That leads me to believe they corrected the article. The linked image has the stress dealing version. But the Coruscant prize support article dated July 10th has a (very beautiful) Slave I card in the spread that does not have the stress. Are these the sources you’re referencing?

As for which version more closely seems to reflect the cited cost for the card (5 points), you may be right but I’m willing to submit a counter-argument. Seasoned Navigator is the most similar upgrade to Slave I, and costs 5 points. It increases the difficulty of the maneuver one step, which would more strongly correlate with the stress dealing Slave I. Also, the Slave I title adds a torpedo slot.

Finally, having a maneuver change with no penalty seems counter to the 2.0 trend...

17 hours ago, Sir13scott said:

In 2.0 they have 1 agility. I know that the whold pack has a lot of error cards but I am shocked this hasn’t been brought up yet. I mean I probably just haven’t see someone post about it yet.

Can you post a picture of these cards that you are speaking of? This is like the fifth time we've seen this same thread between here and /r/xwingtmg and it's starting to get annoying. Mine are fine and so are everyone else. The article had the error, not the printed cards. Complain about the b wings not getting reload or Tie Advanced generics being overpriced, or something else that's real.

1 hour ago, J1mBob said:

Thanks for your help trying to figure out which one is the real one!

The Firespray preview article dated July 2nd has an external link for the Slave I title instead of the usual pop-up for card images. That leads me to believe they corrected the article. The linked image has the stress dealing version. But the Coruscant prize support article dated July 10th has a (very beautiful) Slave I card in the spread that does not have the stress. Are these the sources you’re referencing?

As for which version more closely seems to reflect the cited cost for the card (5 points), you may be right but I’m willing to submit a counter-argument. Seasoned Navigator is the most similar upgrade to Slave I, and costs 5 points. It increases the difficulty of the maneuver one step, which would more strongly correlate with the stress dealing Slave I. Also, the Slave I title adds a torpedo slot.

Finally, having a maneuver change with no penalty seems counter to the 2.0 trend...

Yeah, those are the sources. I believe the Slave 1 title from the conversion kit is also the stress-less version.

As to the pricing, the Navigator is available to any ship with a crew slot and does not necessarily give you stress, he is freely usable all day on blue moves. THe Slave 1 title is also competing with two other great titles, which don't stress you. It could go either way, but my money is on stress free. Is it possible to just display both cards until we get clarification?

12 minutes ago, HolySorcerer said:

Yeah, those are the sources. I believe the Slave 1 title from the conversion kit is also the stress-less version.

As to the pricing, the Navigator is available to any ship with a crew slot and does not necessarily give you stress, he is freely usable all day on blue moves. THe Slave 1 title is also competing with two other great titles, which don't stress you. It could go either way, but my money is on stress free. Is it possible to just display both cards until we get clarification?

Yes I’ll do that. Is there any verified winner in the Edrio wording?

10 minutes ago, J1mBob said:

Yes I’ll do that. Is there any verified winner in the Edrio wording?

Not that I'm aware. He was demoed with one wording and released with another. Normally I would say that the printed version is correct, but all of wave 14/ wave 0 has been a mess. They shouldn't have rushed this, as its given a very poor first impression of 2.0.

2 hours ago, HolySorcerer said:

Not that I'm aware. He was demoed with one wording and released with another. Normally I would say that the printed version is correct, but all of wave 14/ wave 0 has been a mess. They shouldn't have rushed this, as its given a very poor first impression of 2.0.

R4 Astromech is another one. The actual printed card from Saw's Renegades doesn't have any restriction on it, but all of the unboxing videos show that there is a "small ship" only restriction on it. That's going to make a difference to ships like the Kimogila and ARC-170, which are both medium base ships.

1 minute ago, Nspace said:

R4 Astromech is another one. The actual printed card from Saw's Renegades doesn't have any restriction on it, but all of the unboxing videos show that there is a "small ship" only restriction on it. That's going to make a difference to ships like the Kimogila and ARC-170, which are both medium base ships.

Nice catch. I completely missed that restriction. Ouch that is going to hurt.

18 minutes ago, Nspace said:

R4 Astromech is another one. The actual printed card from Saw's Renegades doesn't have any restriction on it, but all of the unboxing videos show that there is a "small ship" only restriction on it. That's going to make a difference to ships like the Kimogila and ARC-170, which are both medium base ships.

Half the cards from that wave were wrong, it was a sloppy rush job that should have been pushed to september.

19 hours ago, ThinkingB said:

Can you post a picture of these cards that you are speaking of? This is like the fifth time we've seen this same thread between here and /r/xwingtmg and it's starting to get annoying. Mine are fine and so are everyone else. The article had the error, not the printed cards. Complain about the b wings not getting reload or Tie Advanced generics being overpriced, or something else that's real.

Woah calm down a little. I was referring to the depiction in the changes google doc and the collected 2.0 browser. Didn’t mean to complain just pointing it out.