{Mafia} Jokes on Jakku

By Madaghmire, in Star Wars: Armada Off-Topic

1 minute ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

Yeah, actually, I'm looking at Ebon and Jabba currently.

I'm still reading back, but on first glance it actually seems like Ebon is using the grudge to then build a legit case against Pod, but the case doesn't yet seem legit. (I have to read the whole damned cryptic contest again.

That said, Jabba looks super fishy right now:

That is a straight claim fish at 3 votes? And the "list" also seems fishy.

fishy?

5 hours ago, The Jabbawookie said:

Me: a picture of complete innocence, I have done nothing wrong ever.

@ovinomanc3r has played a pretty normal game so far, aside from the immediate Ninja vote. Assuming town for now.

@Lord Preyer has contributed a little content and some fluff. Like Ovino, his innocence is far from proven, but I’m assuming town for now.

@BrobaFett made a vague reveal that he can, and will, be held to later. If he’s scum, he’s already got a plan he’s confident in. I’m not gonna vote him yet, wanna see how things shake out.

@PodRacer is being himself. He’s bounced between three different people already. Even if he’s not scum (and that would be a convenient way to play as scum,) he’s giving the scum opportunities to start trains. Pod, I’d like to hear some form of reasoning from now on. If I don’t get it, I’ll consider you a liability and you will get my vote.

@Caldias has contributed a bit so far. He doesn’t read scum, but he wouldn’t. Assuming town for now.

@EbonHawk has voted Pod immediately, seemingly on a grudge, and has a little train started on him. Not sold on his innocence or guilt, because I don’t fully understand what’s going on between him and Pod.

@Madaghmire is totally scum. Mod, you say? Please. He’s fooling you again, when you’d least expect it.

If your name is on the following list, I deem your contributions insufficient. I will likely vote for one of you. Want to avoid this? Say something, make it useful if you can.

@LTD

@Visovics

@Tranceform

@CaribbeanNinja

@MandalorianMoose

@GhostofNobodyInParticular

WTF??

On 7/18/2018 at 1:23 PM, The Jabbawookie said:

## role confirmed

On 7/18/2018 at 1:30 PM, The Jabbawookie said:

So Ovino’s got a rivalry. I get that. What’s your motive, Pod? Shenanigans as usual?

So he understands Ovi on one vote, but doesn't know what is up between Pod and Ebon

14 hours ago, The Jabbawookie said:

That would be your dramatic claim, I think. Simple game means I’d guess Cop (doc proves nothing, really) or a lie (either as scum, or to draw fire.) Not sure what to do with that, but, hey, it’s there.

Fishin'

7 hours ago, The Jabbawookie said:

I don’t understand what they’re arguing about. Is this some kind of grudge?

Again with the not understanding about a grudge. Weird because I think he was part of those games? But wasn't when Ovi got pi$$ed at me?

6 hours ago, The Jabbawookie said:

Me: a picture of complete innocence, I have done nothing wrong ever.

@ovinomanc3r has played a pretty normal game so far, aside from the immediate Ninja vote. Assuming town for now.

@Lord Preyer has contributed a little content and some fluff. Like Ovino, his innocence is far from proven, but I’m assuming town for now.

@BrobaFett made a vague reveal that he can, and will, be held to later. If he’s scum, he’s already got a plan he’s confident in. I’m not gonna vote him yet, wanna see how things shake out.

@PodRacer is being himself. He’s bounced between three different people already. Even if he’s not scum (and that would be a convenient way to play as scum,) he’s giving the scum opportunities to start trains. Pod, I’d like to hear some form of reasoning from now on. If I don’t get it, I’ll consider you a liability and you will get my vote.

@Caldias has contributed a bit so far. He doesn’t read scum, but he wouldn’t. Assuming town for now.

@EbonHawk has voted Pod immediately, seemingly on a grudge, and has a little train started on him. Not sold on his innocence or guilt, because I don’t fully understand what’s going on between him and Pod.

@Madaghmire is totally scum. Mod, you say? Please. He’s fooling you again, when you’d least expect it.

If your name is on the following list, I deem your contributions insufficient. I will likely vote for one of you. Want to avoid this? Say something, make it useful if you can.

@LTD

@Visovics

@Tranceform

@CaribbeanNinja

@MandalorianMoose

@GhostofNobodyInParticular

This is the list that made me suspicious. And again with the "i don't know"

5 hours ago, The Jabbawookie said:

Even Ninja? But at least I understand now. Even if it means your motives aren’t necessarily town motives.

2 hours ago, The Jabbawookie said:

Pod, wanna make a claim?

Claim at three votes?

1 hour ago, The Jabbawookie said:

Broba wasn’t making things easier on the scum; one way or another, time will give us answers there. If you nominate everyone, you give scum a better idea of who they can get town to kill. That’s a problem. In part, I was issuing a warning to Pod telling him to stop flailing around. Also, Pod may well be scum. I don’t strongly suspect him, but I don’t strongly suspect anyone right now.

As good a case as I could make Day 1 I think.

##vote Jabbawookie

5 hours ago, PodRacer said:

$hitposts aside, Im playing to my win condition.

confirmed PodRacer is serial killer

15 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

WTF??

IMHO, policy voting Pod day one for being a basket full of cats and thinking Broba has a well-thought plan if he is scum is about as traditional as mafia gets here on the forums

2 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

So he understands Ovi on one vote, but doesn't know what is up between Pod and Ebon

Fishin'

Again with the not understanding about a grudge. Weird because I think he was part of those games? But wasn't when Ovi got pi$$ed at me?

This is the list that made me suspicious. And again with the "i don't know"

Claim at three votes?

As good a case as I could make Day 1 I think.

##vote Jabbawookie

Glad to see Ninja contribute finally, right guys? :D

Ninja's case against Jabbawookie seems fair enough, but could also just be a new person at mafia fumbling trough while contributing. Interested to see Jabba's response to Ninja's investigating.

3 minutes ago, Caldias said:

IMHO, policy voting Pod day one for being a basket full of cats and thinking Broba has a well-thought plan if he is scum is about as traditional as mafia gets here on the forums

On 7/4/2018 at 9:59 PM, Ginkapo said:

The last games are nothing to be proud of.

?

I too am waiting for Jabba's response, but Ninja is slowly winning me over. I am surprised I missed that in my initial reading, though it was rather rushed.

41 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

So he understands Ovi on one vote, but doesn't know what is up between Pod and Ebon

Fishin'

Again with the not understanding about a grudge. Weird because I think he was part of those games? But wasn't when Ovi got pi$$ed at me?

This is the list that made me suspicious. And again with the "i don't know"

Claim at three votes?

As good a case as I could make Day 1 I think.

##vote Jabbawookie

Pod literally admitted he had a different win condition. That means a role. Since he asked if he could share a mod PM, it seems like he was strongly considering a claim.

As for knowing about the rivalry, I couldn’t have been part of an Ebon v Pod game; I’ve only played where Pod was the mod, and where Ebon was the mod. Ovino v Ninja was mentioned in Pod’s game.

The list is a way to get half these people off their laurels to say something useful. One or two joke posts (Ninja, LTD and Vis) doesn’t get you off the list. Posts actually about the game do.

10 minutes ago, The Jabbawookie said:

The list is a way to get half these people off their laurels to say something useful. One or two joke posts (Ninja, LTD and Vis) doesn’t get you off the list. Posts actually about the game do.

See, this is the thing, for D1, this has actually been quite a vocal game. and me and LTD have been here. Slippy Nippy and Mando a bit less, but still here. ( @VisovicsI will agree has been missing)

So your list looks like you either haven't been paying attention, or that you have an agenda.

Nothing to share unfortunately, I am just observing the arguments used so far. I would vote for Pod following the logic of:

3 hours ago, The Jabbawookie said:

Pod literally admitted he had a different win condition. That means a role. Since he asked if he could share a mod PM, it seems like he was strongly considering a claim.

As for knowing about the rivalry, I couldn’t have been part of an Ebon v Pod game; I’ve only played where Pod was the mod, and where Ebon was the mod. Ovino v Ninja was mentioned in Pod’s game.

The list is a way to get half these people off their laurels to say something useful. One or two joke posts (Ninja, LTD and Vis) doesn’t get you off the list. Posts actually about the game do.

The point I wanted to make about my win con, was that it, imo, is a little suggestive there may be a day kill in this one.

chronologically I don't see how town can win when they're all dead, so I don't really get the composition of my pm

20 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

See, this is the thing, for D1, this has actually been quite a vocal game. and me and LTD have been here. Slippy Nippy and Mando a bit less, but still here. ( @VisovicsI will agree has been missing)

So your list looks like you either haven't been paying attention, or that you have an agenda.

You’re right, I missed a few posts from you and LTD. My bad. It wouldn’t be much of an agenda if it involves splitting the group in half and offering an easy way to get on my good side.

16 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

The point I wanted to make about my win con, was that it, imo, is a little suggestive there may be a day kill in this one.

chronologically I don't see how town can win when they're all dead, so I don't really get the composition of my pm

See, this is interesting. It’s close to the sort of actual info I think we should get if Pod chooses to bring it up (and he could’ve quietly PMed Mads to clarify, he chose to mention to us.) If he doesn’t want to provide his win condition, he shouldn’t justify his actions by saying “it’s my win condition.”

Yeah that last post by Pod has my head spinning.

1 hour ago, PodRacer said:

chronologically I don't see how town can win when they're all dead

Serial Killer, Scum or Survivor? I can’t see anything else in Mad’s setup that would mention all town members being dead in win conditions. In fact, that page doesn’t mention survivor at all.

## Vote @PodRacer

My win con is to eliminate the scum, and ensure at least one townie survives. Ftw.

I just don't see the relevance of the 'surviving townie' part.

suggest to me scum don't win by getting equal numbers with town, and ergo vote control. They must kill all the town so that town cannot fulfil their wincon

Just now, PodRacer said:

My win con is to eliminate the scum, and ensure at least one townie survives. Ftw.

I just don't see the relevance of the 'surviving townie' part.

suggest to me scum don't win by getting equal numbers with town, and ergo vote control. They must kill all the town so that town cannot fulfil their wincon

yep

1 minute ago, The Jabbawookie said:

Serial Killer, Scum or Survivor? I can’t see anything else in Mad’s setup that would mention all town members being dead in win conditions. In fact, that page doesn’t mention survivor at all.

## Vote @PodRacer

nope

##unvote

##vote @The Jabbawookie

Hmm yeah hope fully that gets clarified.

For now we are starting to run low on time,so where is the lynch. I just woke up and am catching up so give me a minute to add my own take on the nights events.

Or to rephrase, it suggest as long as a single town survives, there is always hope for a result.

Just now, ovinomanc3r said:

yep

nope

##unvote

##vote @The Jabbawookie

Yep, took the bait.

databank_sarlacc_01_169_c5356bf9.jpeg?re

So who hasn't voted? 3 hours left we need to ping them.

19 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

My win con is to eliminate the scum, and ensure at least one townie survives. Ftw.

I just don't see the relevance of the 'surviving townie' part.

suggest to me scum don't win by getting equal numbers with town, and ergo vote control. They must kill all the town so that town cannot fulfil their wincon

I assumed the point of that is to clarify the serial killer’s win con is incompatible with town (if we have one.)

1 hour ago, PodRacer said:

The point I wanted to make about my win con, was that it, imo, is a little suggestive there may be a day kill in this one.

chronologically I don't see how town can win when they're all dead, so I don't really get the composition of my pm

But where is this “no town left alive” stuff coming from?

My win con states town can win with a single player surviving.

usually is the last day was 2 players t vs s scum wins, but my role pm hints there is more than meets the eye. IMO.

Either that or it's a huge 'there are third parties present' tell

10 minutes ago, The Jabbawookie said:

But where is this “no town left alive” stuff coming from?

Apparently Jabba is not in fight club.

4 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

My win con states town can win with a single player surviving.

usually is the last day was 2 players t vs s scum wins, but my role pm hints there is more than meets the eye. IMO.

2 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

Either that or it's a huge 'there are third parties present' tell

STOP talking about this before you give them more.