Thoughts on this Ghost card in conjunction with Phantom II

By EbonHawk, in Star Wars: Armada Rules Questions

7244h.jpg 7245h.jpg

What is the question?

2 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

What is the question?

thoughts on them, abilities wise, dice, points.. Do you like them?

I am not sure this is the proper sub-forum

An Intel source with 8 hull points, counter 2 and that cannot be targeted seems a op too me. Even for 38 points.

Also "be present" must be defined.

1 hour ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I am not sure this is the proper sub-forum

An Intel source with 8 hull points, counter 2 and that cannot be targeted seems a op too me. Even for 38 points.

Also "be present" must be defined.

agree about present, would change it to define distance 1.

Intel wise it suits the ship imo with chopper and hera. could also drop the phantom to 3 health to minimise the effect a tad.

Could also make phantom a 2 blue dice anti squadron

7 hours ago, EbonHawk said:

agree about present, would change it to define distance 1.

Intel wise it suits the ship imo with chopper and hera. could also drop the phantom to 3 health to minimise the effect a tad.

I also think it suits. It's just that from a game balance standpoint. One intel source with twice the hull, counter, rogue, hitting like a **** and a ability that allows it to be untouchable providing him a 14 points scatter escort that take shot obstructed and has control over opponents dice is... too much.

13 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I also think it suits. It's just that from a game balance standpoint. One intel source with twice the hull, counter, rogue, hitting like a **** and a ability that allows it to be untouchable providing him a 14 points scatter escort that take shot obstructed and has control over opponents dice is... too much.

Jan Orrs

12 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

Jan Orrs

Exactly. Jan Ors is ******* tough and has 4 hull, not rogue, her hitting is pretty standard and is already 20 (19?).

This one is a 12 hull scatter-brace token, tons of dice, counter, rogue, obstructed, jammer intel source that screws IG and snipe power to target her.

7 hours ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I also think it suits. It's just that from a game balance standpoint. One intel source with twice the hull, counter, rogue, hitting like a **** and a ability that allows it to be untouchable providing him a 14 points scatter escort that take shot obstructed and has control over opponents dice is... too much.

What about drop the obstructed rule and change it to something like when Phantom 2 is destroyed, ghost suffers 1 damage (as it comes out the ship so could suffer if destroyed). I've also changed the scatter to orange so is a one shot token only now. Dropped the anti ship die on phantom, and a hull from 4 to 3, and dropped Ghosts counter to 1, just for the top 360 turret only.

Card's should've updated above, apart from changing Phantoms ruling.

I would say when destroyed the ghost suffers 1 damage, to stop it being moved away before it dies and preventing it.

With 3 hull, and a orange scatter, it would be susceptible to a good shot. I also removed counter 1 and kept it at 14pts

I like the new limitation to distance 1.

1 hour ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I like the new limitation to distance 1.

Both cards have updated now to show the new rules and stats

5 hours ago, EbonHawk said:

I would say when destroyed the ghost suffers 1 damage, to stop it being moved away before it dies and preventing it.

With 3 hull, and a orange scatter, it would be susceptible to a good shot. I also removed counter 1 and kept it at 14pts

“Friendly Ghost”

... goddambit Casper...

But I mean, spec friendly, or someone will use it to spike damage to an enemy in a mirror match ?

25 minutes ago, Drasnighta said:

“Friendly Ghost”

... goddambit Casper...

But I mean, spec friendly, or someone will use it to spike damage to an enemy in a mirror match ?

Cheers man, still learning on how to word everything right :) what you think of them?

19 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

Cheers man, still learning on how to word everything right :) what you think of them?

No opinion.

Just rules wording.