I've been playing armor a certain way and my wife has started to think that maybe it isn't right...
When a hero performs a battle action or any ability that allows two attacks from the same hero in the same turn I have decided that if the hero punches through the monster's armor on the first roll that it remains punched through for the second. Similarly if a monster's armor is five and you do three damage on both rolls the cumulative effect is a loss of one for the monster.
The question is whether I missed a rule somewhere and am doing something right or did I just make up something?