GUERILLA MAFIA.

By PodRacer, in Star Wars: Armada Off-Topic

34 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

L1 surely?

VC is reset, clock remains.

##vote Mad

Since it was reset. I know I am clear. I can state some evidence, and claim, if you guys want, but I can't really prove it.

32 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

##vote Mad

Since it was reset. I know I am clear. I can state some evidence, and claim, if you guys want, but I can't really prove it.

I don't want you to claim. I want you to call the ewoks

34 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

##vote Mad

Since it was reset. I know I am clear. I can state some evidence, and claim, if you guys want, but I can't really prove it.

Well you can actually claim as long as is a copy paste of your PM

17 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I don't want you to claim. I want you to call the ewoks

Why would I suicide? That's ridiculous. If I die, only Broba is left as confirmed town. 1 out of 3. I don't like those odds. Why should I trust you, or Mad? Vis believed you were clean, ok. He never said he confirmed it though.

1 minute ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Why would I suicide? That's ridiculous. If I die, only Broba is left as confirmed town. 1 out of 3. I don't like those odds. Why should I trust you, or Mad? Vis believed you were clean, ok. He never said he confirmed it though.

We are 2 confirmed town. I am here I didn't vote Mad yet

Try again. It didn’t worth a mod kill.

5 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

We are 2 confirmed town. I am here I didn't vote Mad yet

How are you confirmed town?

Just now, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

How are you confirmed town?

Cause I didn't hammer Mad, maybe?

He is at l-1 thanks to you. If I am scum I am... how Gink would say it? I cannot remember. Whatever.

*Sigh*

@BrobaFett - as the only surviving confirmed town, I shall follow your advice. What do you think? Should I agree to ovi's request and suicide?

1 minute ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

*Sigh*

@BrobaFett - as the only surviving confirmed town, I shall follow your advice. What do you think? Should I agree to ovi's request and suicide?

You realize I could just hammer Mad, kill Broba at night and win, aren't you?

1 minute ago, ovinomanc3r said:

You realize I could just hammer Mad, kill Bro  ba at night and win, aren't you? 

Good point. I'll still wait for Broba's response though. We have the time.

10 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Good point. I'll still wait for Broba's response though. We have the time.

Ok let's talk in the meanwhile.

I told you why I cannot be scum. I also understand you think is Mad. Could you explain me why is Mad without saying "well, it is not me"?

1 minute ago, ovinomanc3r said:

Ok let's talk in the meanwhile.

I told you why I cannot be scum. I also understand you think is Mad. Could you explain me why is Mad without saying "well, it is not me"?

I can try.

Mad has been in the shadows most of the time, voting and making cases, but always providing analysis that could be leading. I dislike analysis that edits the posts and words of the accused, and ever since Gink as scum 'advised' me, leading to a scum win, I am suspicious of those who provide analysis and do not look at it. Mad did that. He gave his opinion and didn't discuss it. As if he was worried that scrutiny would reveal cracks. Granted, he was right against Preyer, but for the wrong reasons, I think. He was wrong about Cal though (weren't we all?).

I dunno, it's not so much concrete evidence as a hunch supported by process of elimination. Somehow, I have been off every train to date, not just those that got scum, but all of them . I am, frankly, rather surprised by this.

14 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

I can try.

Mad has been in the shadows most of the time, voting and making cases, but always providing analysis that could be leading. I dislike analysis that edits the posts and words of the accused, and ever since Gink as scum 'advised' me, leading to a scum win, I am suspicious of those who provide analysis and do not look at it. Mad did that. He gave his opinion and didn't discuss it. As if he was worried that scrutiny would reveal cracks. Granted, he was right against Preyer, but for the wrong reasons, I think. He was wrong about Cal though (weren't we all?).

I dunno, it's not so much concrete evidence as a hunch supported by process of elimination. Somehow, I have been off every train to date, not just those that got scum, but all of them . I am, frankly, rather surprised by this.

And how do you explain the extinguisher?

1 minute ago, ovinomanc3r said:

And how do you explain the extinguisher?

Thief. Nobody else has been turned thief yet, he must be it.

Just now, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Thief. Nobody else has been turned thief yet, he must be it.

But when he stole it?

N1 it was Cal's mine. N2 it was LP's weapon*

*The weapon was definitely stolen or LP lied about killing Gink.

On the other side it is true that Mad could be quite sure about LP because he stole the weapon but why the **** he had an extinguisher?

12 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

But when he stole it?

N1 it was Cal's mine. N2 it was LP's weapon*

*The weapon was definitely stolen or LP lied about killing Gink.

On the other side it is true that Mad could be quite sure about LP because he stole the weapon but why the **** he had an extinguisher?

I dunno. It could be possible that he had the extinguisher for himself.

3 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

I dunno. It could be possible that he had the extinguisher for himself.

That has no sense at all. I mean, it is obvious anyone on the cook line knew he was. He wouldn't know as Vis didn't know. So 1 scum is given an extinguisher in order to use on himself not knowing he was even covered by fuel?

Such a crappy action really looks townie.

1 minute ago, ovinomanc3r said:

That has no sense at all. I mean, it is obvious anyone on the cook line knew he was. He wouldn't know as Vis didn't know. So 1 scum is given an extinguisher in order to use on himself not knowing he was even covered by fuel?

As I said, I dunno. I am confused. You made a good point about opportunity.

3 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

Such a crappy action really looks townie.

What, having the extinguisher? Why? The scum don't seem to have any other protection, why not something to save them from a serial killer?

3 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

What, having the extinguisher? Why? The scum don't seem to have any other protection, why not something to save them from a serial killer?

It is not like they would have known. Being the thief is far more useful to protect yourself against eventual combustion.

The combustion is already random so better you use it right at start of the day and, if lucky, you could save someone. Man, the extinguisher needs a dead player and a tracker in order to work and scum needs to be really lucky to be the target of he weapon and to have a tracker that could point out he was visited and didn't die with other no-killing visitors like a cop, a babysitter, another tracker and a neighbourizer around.

It is so crappy that even being town I wold say it is a fake action but the ewoks didn't appear.

No matter how much I wanted to believe you. At this point the best thing is one of you both commit suicide and let Broba and me lynch the remaining scum.

18 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

It is not like they would have known. Being the thief is far more useful to protect yourself against eventual combustion.

Maybe. I don't have an answer to that.