I would like a ruling (official, if possible) on the following situation, which wasn't in the FAQ:
The Loser declares an upset, but only has negotiate encounter cards. The opponent must play an attack card, so this is an attack v. negotiate encounter. Normally the player who played an attack card would win, but due to the Loser's power the winner and loser are reversed. Therefore, the opponent who played an attack card ultimately loses.
Now, since this is an attack v. negotiate encounter, does the player who ultimately lost the encounter (the Loser's opponent, after the Loser's power reverses the outcome) collect compensation?
Related question: In this same situation, must the Loser reveal her hand to play a negotiate card after declaring an upset?