Players alive:

 1- @PodRacer (0)-

 2- @LTD (3)- Madaghmire, MandalorianMoose, Podracer, EbonHawk, GhostofNobodyInParticular

3- @GhostofNobodyInParticular (0)-

4- @EbonHawk (1)- LTD

5- @Madaghmire (2)- EbonHawk, Ovinomac3r,

6- @CaribbeanNinja (0)-

7- @ovinomanc3r (0)-

8- @MandalorianMoose (0)-

 9- @Lord Preyer (0)-

 9 players alive, 5 to hammer

LTD currently stands at L-2, self voting is indeed not valid

(out rn, clock incoming, be patient with 4G that doesn’t collaborate)

~ 30 hours remaining

15 hours ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

*Sigh* How many times do I have to tell you folks that this is how I play? I've been lynched more times than I can remember for exactly this style of play, and 90% of those times I was town. If I have something to add, I will. Otherwise I won't. I don't like wasting a post just to superficially show a presence. Heck, you guys even state that you dislike no-substance posts, then you get suspicious of me for not providing them? Why?

Gnips plays like this if he's scum or not. Reading through the last game he was quiet on Korriban but less so than now... However upon that re-read and some previous games I looked through it seems Gnips as scum seems to push more in his posts, and adds 1-2 more per day, from his interactions with us so far I'm willing to town pass him myself as I'm more inclined to agree he's been town quiet. So far to my knowledge he hasn't pushed too much. But if I'm giving him a pass for this turn to allow him to come out D2 with a bit more chat to add than he has it narrows down my suspects..

Now on the cal breadcrumb and having a night to think about it, Mads argument is convincing against LTD, the breadcrumb along with LTD defence on Preyer and cals vote on Preyer make it look even more so, and that is where my problem lays... it's almost too plausible and I find the back of my mind niggling at me..

We say a Vet would be the one to spot that breadcrumb and it seemed to catch most of us off guard, the Vet who did pick it up was Mad.. Mad was also the one to point out connection between Cal voting Preyer, LTDs defence, and the breadcrumb.. then said LTD could have seen this and used it for Towns push on Preyer would turn inno and clean LTD..

I find it more and more likely Mad could have seen all this himself D1 and colluded in Scum chat to force this very outcome, which IMO seems more likely than LTD a relative new comer to Mafia to spot the crumb, and see the link he could push himself (Mad pushed the Idea of LTD using Preyers innocence as a shield D2 before LTD even posted or town pushed Preyer to see if he would do as mad said). For some reason hanging LTD I feel i'm helping a scum play go down right now

Because IMO I see mad killing cal and seeing the chance to throw confusion with LTDs vote/death as most likely imo ##vote @Madaghmire

Well, I am fine with

##vote Madaghmire

I have nothing against him. I just want to check the chance of him bluffin. If he flipped town, then I guess we could go after LTD as his target and CNinja as probably the veteran mafia who did catch the breadcrumb.

5 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

Gnips plays like this if he's scum or not. Reading through the last game he was quiet on Korriban but less so than now... However upon that re-read and some previous games I looked through it seems Gnips as scum seems to push more in his posts, and adds 1-2 more per day, from his interactions with us so far I'm willing to town pass him myself as I'm more inclined to agree he's been town quiet. So far to my knowledge he hasn't pushed too much. But if I'm giving him a pass for this turn to allow him to come out D2 with a bit more chat to add than he has it narrows down my suspects..

Now on the cal breadcrumb and having a night to think about it, Mads argument is convincing against LTD, the breadcrumb along with LTD defence on Preyer and cals vote on Preyer make it look even more so, and that is where my problem lays... it's almost too plausible and I find the back of my mind niggling at me..

We say a Vet would be the one to spot that breadcrumb and it seemed to catch most of us off guard, the Vet who did pick it up was Mad.. Mad was also the one to point out connection between Cal voting Preyer, LTDs defence, and the breadcrumb.. then said LTD could have seen this and used it for Towns push on Preyer would turn inno and clean LTD..

I find it more and more likely Mad could have seen all this himself D1 and colluded in Scum chat to force this very outcome, which IMO seems more likely than LTD a relative new comer to Mafia to spot the crumb, and see the link he could push himself (Mad pushed the Idea of LTD using Preyers innocence as a shield D2 before LTD even posted or town pushed Preyer to see if he would do as mad said). For some reason hanging LTD I feel i'm helping a scum play go down right now

Because IMO I see mad killing cal and seeing the chance to throw confusion with LTDs vote/death as most likely imo ##vote @Madaghmire

I'm not sure if we really think the same or you are just camping around my posts...

10 minutes ago, Visovics said:

(out rn, clock incoming, be patient with 4G)

18 hours gone, 30 left

1 minute ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I'm not sure if we really think the same or you are just camping around my posts...

come again?

1 minute ago, EbonHawk said:

come again?

I meant I just suggested Mad and you quickly build a case against him and vote. I was just thinking about him and writing my vote and your post felt like pushing myself to vote him. Two votes within a minute seems a strong bate swing for the vote record.

19 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

LTD or Ghost. They didn't cast a vote during first day (LTD at least voted me).

Also I think checking if Mad is bluffing could be helpful.

ugh! I am really rusty.

ah only just noticed, must've gone out when I was typing up, I was a few pages back to get quotes and didn't refresh until I'd posted

I actually thought the same on your vote coming in quick lol

5 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

ah only just noticed, must've gone out when I was typing up, I was a few pages back to get quotes and didn't refresh until I'd posted

I actually thought the same on your vote coming in quick lol

maybe this one better

Just now, ovinomanc3r said:

maybe this one better

This on the droid in the back is Preyer

1 hour ago, LTD said:

Well, if I can vote for myself ovinomanc3r just posted after a hammer, so that's a modkill.

Serious WTF right here.

I'm thinking I'd be more pissed if we let LTD go with all of this against him.

Just now, CaribbeanNinja said:

I'm thinking I'd be more pissed if we let LTD go with all of this against him.

we wont, If mad flips town I'll take LTD tonight

I can prove I’m town. I’d prefer not to be forced into a claim at d2.

Just now, Madaghmire said:

I can prove I’m town. I’d prefer not to be forced into a claim at d2.

Nor would I but, and a big but if you can actually prove it then so can I so that would be 2 people off the list, inc cal, that leaves 7 people..

we assume mando is the bus driver, 6 people, take out the Town messenger who sent me a message via Vis last night that goes down to 5 people, off those 5 people 2 are scum.. so if what you say is true that's a pretty narrow list considering if we pick both right out of the 5 we could be over tomorrow

Why is the messenger towie? Also the bus driver?

Just now, ovinomanc3r said:

Why is the messenger towie? Also the bus driver?

neither one is a normally considered a mafia role (I could be wrong, but I think that's true)

The only messenger I remember was mafia.

I concede townie bus driver is enough punishment for town and too good for mafia but seems a good fake breadcrumb too.

16 minutes ago, Madaghmire said:

I can prove I’m town. I’d prefer not to be forced into a claim at d2.

Win condition could be enough I guess.

4 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

The only messenger I remember was mafia.

I concede townie bus driver is enough punishment for town and too good for mafia but seems a good fake breadcrumb too.

If that’s the case that’s a compelling target for the night... I must not of played that game

4 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

If that’s the case that’s a compelling target for the night... I must not of played that game

I think it was the very first. Maybe the second.

Weren't you @Visovics?

4 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

Weren't you @Visovics?

If it was Vis who played the role, than I very much doubt he changed the alignment which changes the whole way I look at this game for one player.. any guesses who? Answers must be five words of less

12 hours ago, PodRacer said:

##unvote

Intent to look elsewhere

for now.

I was just about to Ping the Pod and see what his investigations had uncovered.

(I don't think we can verify the role either way though, as I could totally see Vis making that a town or a scum role.)