16 minutes ago, TheVeteranSergeant said:I saw it last week. I enjoyed it. It's campy and fun in the way you'd want a summer action movie to be. Definitely way better than the trailers led me to expect.
I'd put it below Rogue One, but it does capture that "Star Wars feel" in its look and tone. The humor seems more organic. Nearly all the jokes in The Last Jedi felt flat and out of place. That isn't a problem in Solo. Donald Glover is great as Lando, but his sidekick is every bit as obnoxious as her name is (fortunately she doesn't have a lot of screen time). Alden Ehrenreich is a decent Han Solo. I think he got a fair amount of the mannerisms right, and the story makes Han Solo feel like Han Solo (though I couldn't help but notice that Ehrenreich is quite a bit shorter than Harrison Ford). Woody Harrelson is good, and I liked his crew. Emilia Clarke's acting is exactly what you expect it to be.
That said, while it is fun, the reviews saying it isn't memorable are spot on. I don't know if there is even one scene in Solo that will stick with anyone. No really memorable characters. No great bits of dialog. No amazing action sequences. No good battles. I mean, it has all those things. Dialog, action, battles, etc. It's just that they're not going to stick with anybody. You'll enjoy Solo. You'll like most of the characters. Unless one of the plot twists in the third act makes you mad, you will probably not care much about the story. Who is Han Solo? Turns out the answer isn't all that interesting.
In the end its just a movie that entertained you. There's too much need for every movie to be world changing anyway. If Solo has brought back a bit of fun to the franchise, then it will have achieved its aim.
Is there a need for it? You can ask the same of any origin story film. The first Cap America movie, Thor etc were not particularly memorable to me and I didn't need them. But they were OK and entertained for a couple of hours though, right?
Edited by Gallanteer