23 hours ago, AllWingsStandyingBy said:I don't think I'm the arbiter of how movies have been received by audiences (in fact, the whole point of my first post was to look at the empirical data that might be used). Looking at what is, in my opinion, the best available data out there on audience reception to TLJ, it suggests that most people didn't like it (~65%). Of course this isn't a scientific poll that includes in its sample size every single person who ever saw the movie, but that type of data does not and never will exist. So if we want to say anything about a film's reception, we can either look to the best available data or else say nothing at all beyond mere unfounded speculation.
You are now, in fact, PROVING my assertion that you don't understand statistics or polling. It is not remotely necessary to ask every single person who ever saw a movie to get scientific data about it. What is required is a representative sample size of the entire population. The larger the sample, the better, but it is not remotely necessary to get 100%. That means that the poll's participants are carefully selected by the people doing the poll and attempts to remove possible variants are made.
For example, to reduce the chances of variance in terms of culture or nationality, you'd want to make sure you asked a representative people from each region. In the case of a movie like Star Wars, let's say 10% of the people who watched it were from Japan. You'd want to try to make sure about 10% of the people who took the poll were too, that way if Japanese people liked or disliked the movie more than the rest, that would be properly accounted for.
To the degree which these things are not possible, you can assign a "margin of error". A perfect poll would ask every single person, and therefore cover every possible answer, and would therefore have a margin of error of zero. Such polls almost never exist, but it's not uncommon to see a poll with a margin of error of + or - 3 or 4%. In other words, they will state that "27% of all viewers of X movie liked it, plus or minus 5%. That means maybe it was only 22%, or maybe it was as much as 32%, but they can say with a high degree of certainty that the true answer lies somewhere in that range.
The numbers you cite were as unscientific as it is possible to get. It is a small sample size, and self-selected, with high probability of bias in the selected sample.
So I would say your 65% figure has a margin of error of about 64%. You can call it "data" if you want, but it's just about as worthless as throwing a dart at a page with numbers on it, and choosing that.


