15 minutes ago, ForceSensitive said:UnGuy is a short hand so that I don't blow up his in box with notifications. I didn't call him a prick for crying out loud. Get the two straight. Serves me right for trying to be at least the tiniest bit considerate. Also, since he did ask nicely(rather ironically now): @Undeadguy fair, I'll try and be better about that. To be real though I got A TON of people trying to talk to me right now and all their comments are getting jumbled in my head which isn't helping. I'm trying to hit on the ideas to conserve space, and not the people as much just so it's not personal ad much as can be expected, and y'all can just take or leave what you want. And I ramble anyway, further compounding the problem. Very stream of consciousness type of writer.
Back to my history post, scuse @Ardaedhel
On Riekan, as it will not surprise you, not all the things we say in our local groups make it into the forums. Around that time your looking I was probably still in school full time and working full time. My forum use was a bit more focused on other things and just liking posts while on brief breaks. It was such a foregone conclusion in my mind further commentary wasn't necessary. And then guess what. HE GOT NERFED!
On tractors, yup, you found one. Told you you would didn't I? Imagine that, an honest self assessment. So weird. Problem then was I got so burned back then in X-wing I had a huge reaction to them in Armada. Proved wrong, later used them for fun games. Like I said earlier "when I'm screwing around with Konstantine (rip tournament scoring)". Thank god they aren't THAT good. I feel like somewhere in there should even be a comment of how I overreacted, though many times I'll start working posts and then delete them as I get distracted and lose train of thought with work or whatever, and that may have been one of them. But for real dude major props on the search. Cherry pick some more. This is fun.
And clusters. In the words of Obi-wan "good job". Did you not notice the post was phrased in questions? Asking WHY we DIDN'T see them too often? And I quote "I feel like they [would be good]" and then held up no evidence to declare myself factually correct. Hmm, curious that. People were looking for responses to fighters in that thread, I was offering suggestions asking why they weren't considered. It's not like we had external racks back then, which are kinda obviously what they were hoping to do with CB but way the h#$@ better. Or raiders, which admittedly suck still. Didn't see many of those doing well at worlds did we. Hadn't stopped the forums from trying to prove otherwise. Also at the time my response to fighters, was duh fighters. I only engaged in the conversation to offer what my side of the equation was in personal experience. Never said they were Good as a card, just as a desirable effect for what they were trying to do if they could make it work. Heaven forbid I ask a question or offer a hypothetical solution for testing on a public forum. In fact, didn't they answer that later? I remember that thread being rather productive.
Am I the only one taking about how great the 75 is still? It'd be fun in a madine list. But no it's not OP. I want more reasons to use the Profundity with some new objectives though. That would be sweet.
@Roquax There had got to be more to that story and I'm dying to hear it. ? ? I need pics, if they cracked the Raddus code with Warlord, the world needs to know. ?
You're obviously passionate which is great but I think you out to slow down on the energy drinks. Go get yourself a YORKSHIRE cup of tea and calm down a little.
Your points may be valid but they're coming across a little bit preachy just at the moment.