Just now, penpenpen said:No, it suggests it could be. I would emphasize this but I think you have used more than everyone's fair share of typographical frivolities already.
The only thing that proves anything about the rules (emphasis: rules) are the rules themselves and the devs' commentaries. But hey, your inability to separate crunch from fluff is nothing new, so unless you have a point to make (but please, for the love of George, not in bold type), I'll be bowing out of this subtopic for tonight.
No. It specifically says how it works, not how it "could" work.