12 minutes ago, Captain Lackwit said:I'm not asserting that the game's timeline only moves chronologically in concurrence with the content. That'd be asinine. I'm saying that a mutli-man vessel with astromechs , shielding, hyperdrive, etc, makes zero sense for The Empire.
53 minutes ago, Captain Lackwit said:
The game is the timeline going forward, never backwards.
11 hours ago, Commander Kaine said:First of all, we have examples of the same ships in different factions having different upgrade bars. The Y-Wing has changed droids, the Z-95 and the Slave I has illicit slots... Also, Imperials removed the droids from their ARC-s , so it would be incredibly easy to just solve this issue. Just slap a system slot on it, differentiating from the rebel Arc immediately. So there is really no issue of astromechs at all.
So. These. In one of my earlier posts, I mentioned the issue of astromechs that you brought up. I have explained it how there is precedent for changing upgrade bars between factions for the same craft, and I mentioned that the Imperials that actually used these ships, have removed the Droids from them. There is a whole bit of lore about imperials really hating droids. Their pilots were all about human skill. Anyways.. You have subsequently ignored this point in every comment you made after, and used it as an excuse of why Imperials wouldn't get the ARC.
The other thing is of course, a quote of you saying something, while claiming that you have never done so.
And yet again, in this small snippet of a quote, you manage to mention a third thing I have explained before. Namely, that the fact that if a ship has shielding and hyperdrives, the empire wouldn't use it (presumably you say this because of the Imperial doctrine of cheap and expendable ships). And yes, of course. That doctrine existed in the empire from approx 15 BBY to ABY1. Before, they used the military doctrine of the late republic, clone armies and their equipment, only in sexy sexy grey color, and after Yavin, they used the more advanced versions of the TIE series... You know... the Defender program for example? Or any of the other more advanced ties? Those ships have shields and hyperdrive, and the Empire still uses them. What you are describing as "The Imperial Doctrine" is a large, but relatively uneventful period in the Empire, of course they didn't use a lot of sophisticated fighters. It is not a rule of law, and hasn't been the state of the game since wave 4.
I'm not going to argue about the ARC further, I just wanted to show you what I mean when I say, you ignore my points. I quote 2 sentences from you, and in it you mention several points I addressed before, quite extensively I believe. I even brought examples. Then you take this examples, manage to ignore/skip over the point, and try to make me sound like I'm a rambling lunatic.
The point is: You make a statement that is objectively not true. For example: "
I'm saying that a mutli-man vessel with astromechs, shielding, hyperdrive, etc, makes zero sense for The Empire.
". I explain why each of those points, bringing up examples for many of them, or explaining the work around that is precedented, and lore friendly...
(Ie, Multiman: Phantom, Astromechs: See above, Shielding, hyperdirve: Advanced, Defender, Hunter, TAP)
And you don't seem to notice that I have done so.
I'm really curious what do you think of this. Because to me, it seems like you ignored these points, despite me going on about them for soon, 14 hours.