Begun, the TV Spots have.
Crew
Risk
’Han’
’Featurette’
’Team’
’Rivals’
’Solo’ 360
’Ride’
’Risk’
’Han meets Lando’
’Holochess’
Begun, the TV Spots have.
Crew
Risk
’Han’
’Featurette’
’Team’
’Rivals’
’Solo’ 360
’Ride’
’Risk’
’Han meets Lando’
’Holochess’
That ship at 0.21 looks new.
Also, Chewie doesn't like Hans hand does he?
Chewie could use some work on his Sabbac face. It does look like Chewie finally gets how due spot back on the big screen instead of just drivning Miss Daisy.
Since this doesn't have anything to do with Legion, has anyone thought to do a Conveyex table?
For you Scum enthusiasts, Dryden Vos, leads the criminal syndicate Crimson Dawn.
Edited by Imperial Advisor Arem Heshvaun
I’m ready to see some Corellia tables please.
Tickets for Solo go on sale midnight May the 4th.
Naturally.
’Life of Crime’ Spot
he's got a lot of wrinkles in his forehead.
I wish they'd just release random smuggler movie instead of rewriting Han Solo's character. The more you mess with mystique, the more you're let down usually.
Funny how Kessel went from a barren planetoid with barely an atmosphere to a hot & lush planet.
17 hours ago, Imperial Advisor Arem Heshvaun said:
To be clear, it seems he signed a contract for three movies, it does not confirm that adfitional movies are indeed in the works.
It is likely standard procedure to acquire a talents contract for multiple movies, even if not definitively planned. It is a way of lessening scheduling conflicts and dealing with re-casting a part.
Of course things may come up, but as time is money, you want to minimize any issues.
I believe the actors in the Marvel Netflix shows also have contracts that they will be availiable if needed in a movie, but that doesn't necessarily mean they will - if that fact is true.
3 minutes ago, That Blasted Samophlange said:Stuff.
Your points are all valid of course, @That Blasted Samophlange and may ring very true from the business practices of many decades in that industry.
But Disney, Marvel and of course Star Wars properties are far more calculated in thier methodology and the way they sprinkle, tease and drop snippets here and there.
For Alden Ehrenreich to make such a straightforward comment means that he got approval from somewhere.
No less than three actors have come out saying they have been contracted for three films.
It’s not the smoking gun, but it is the unfastened hoster.
I'd just like to point out that Felicity Jones was under contract for more than one Star Wars movie as well. https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/12/star-wars-felicity-jones-rogue-one-sequel
Doing things like that gives a company like Lucasfilm flexibility at the time they are hiring the actors, since plans can change later, and if the movie turns out to be a hit, locking them in at the same rate as the first is advantageous. Plus, the scripts aren't usually entirely done at the time those contracts are signed.
If Ehrenreich is signed for more movies, it means they wanted to keep the option to do so open, not necessarily that there would be more. In all likelihood, they'll wait to see how this film goes before deciding whether to make more.
28 minutes ago, Freeptop said:I'd just like to point out that Felicity Jones was under contract for more than one Star Wars movie as well. https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/12/star-wars-felicity-jones-rogue-one-sequel
Doing things like that gives a company like Lucasfilm flexibility at the time they are hiring the actors, since plans can change later, and if the movie turns out to be a hit, locking them in at the same rate as the first is advantageous. Plus, the scripts aren't usually entirely done at the time those contracts are signed.
If Ehrenreich is signed for more movies, it means they wanted to keep the option to do so open, not necessarily that there would be more. In all likelihood, they'll wait to see how this film goes before deciding whether to make more.
Originally, Jyn and Kassan were going to survive in Rogue One. I think they wanted to do more with the characters. They changed it in the reshoots. For the better IMO.
We know Han is going to survive this movie, LOL.
2 minutes ago, Ken on Cape said:Originally, Jyn and Kassan were going to survive in Rogue One. I think they wanted to do more with the characters. They changed it in the reshoots. For the better IMO.
We know Han is going to survive this movie, LOL.
Thus, signing them early gave them flexibility to do more with the characters, if they wished to. Then they went in a different direction, so those options for more movies weren't necessary.
In terms of Solo, if it turns out that the movie doesn't do well, Lucasfilm isn't obligated to make more movies about Han Solo pre-ANH, either, even if the character is alive.
I mean, if it does do well, of course they'll take advantage of the option to make more. If it's going to make them more money, of course they'd do it. I'm just saying that signing the actor beyond the first movie isn't a guarantee of more movies.
1 hour ago, Indy_com said:I see some new things here:
Beckett’s Gun!
Do some Officers wear caps in lieu of helmets?
And the under foot of a walker.
Edited by Imperial Advisor Arem Heshvaun
The picture most certainly originally featured Gina Torres and Nathan Filion, with the text "Mal & Zoe in the trenches on Serenity Valley". No doubt about it
In Last Shot the novel by Daniel José Older, Han muses that the Falcon under Lando’s ownership had no personality and referred to the ship as ‘ a mainiac’s immaculate cape museum .’
I love that description ?
11 hours ago, Imperial Advisor Arem Heshvaun said:Beckett’s Gun!
Seen before...
by Michael ‘Gorilla’ Pasquale