On 5/8/2018 at 3:53 PM, Deuzerre said:Why would it have to be a mirror?
The empire and the rebels are different entities. The empire is "lawful evil", the order and bad guys, they have the firepower and authority, they aren't supposed to go subtle.
The rebels are "chaotic good", doing what has to be done with what they have to get rid of the bad guys. They have to be more subtle.
No need to have a mirror with the empire getting "infiltrators".
Nobody is saying it has to be anything, but there isn't much opinion to be explored in the mirrors that are present, and have been present in the game so far.
And they mirror eachother for the reason of balance within game design. All game design comes to a middle ground between what feels right, and what is mechanically balanced and fair to play.
Which is why I posed the question about a mirror for Han. Sure, they could start doing stuff completely different and releasing units that start utilising mechanics completely different from eachother - but they haven't so far and I wouldn't expect it.
On 5/8/2018 at 6:16 PM, Jman444 said:Even if we dont get him right away, I think Kallus would work great in this middle-ground space, he's both a good leader tactically and good in combat. I think once more "best of both worlds" commanders come out, those will be highly played.
Think Kallus is a shout. An Aggressive Mid Range Commander. Han strikes me as much more of a Jack of all trades. Leia is definitely a squishy support, as is Veers. Luke and Vader both a rally point and hard hitter. Han *could* serve multiple purposes within a list. Wouldn't be surprised by a Thrawn, Rae Sloane (lesser known but relevant to both Rebels and the GCW). Both strike me as Characters that could be strong mid range, objective based characters with decent Hit Points, decent damage and command cards that shake things up not unlike Han.