6 minutes ago, Captain Lackwit said:

I'm sure it has nothing to do with how not only is TLJ the newest one, but in this day and age everything ever is awful all the time for all time. Definitely not a factor at all.

Yeah, times have changed since... December 2016.

11 hours ago, Astech said:

TLJ 48%

Given the ACTIVE review bombing by enraged haters this particular film suffered, if it still holds at 48%, it is because it truly must be an awesome cinema masterpiece.

2 hours ago, Captain Lackwit said:

I'm sure it has nothing to do with how not only is TLJ the newest one, but in this day and age everything ever is awful all the time for all time. Definitely not a factor at all.

It... You... They...

26 minutes ago, Jehan Menasis said:

Given the ACTIVE review bombing by enraged haters this particular film suffered, if it still holds at 48%, it is because it truly must be an awesome cinema masterpiece.

That's a pretty valuable argument, but TPM was review bombed way harder, and still beats it in the polls. The only hard data we have is the user ratings and the total number of reviews.

If 200'000 people - on a single site - give a product a bad review (say, a toaster), almost all people would look for a different product to spend their hard-earned money on. The same goes for movies, once the hype goes down.

2 hours ago, Jehan Menasis said:

Given the ACTIVE review bombing by enraged haters this particular film suffered, if it still holds at 48%, it is because it truly must be an awesome cinema masterpiece.

People forget that. Review bombing is very much a frakking thing. But no, surely numbers are gospel.