Saw G's 1pt crew is niche but that could be very, very painful...

If im reading it right, suffer 1 damage to mod all focus to crits when attacking. Ouch...

Something for Corran after he double taps.

Favorite part? How the TIE Reaper absolutely dwarfs the U-Wing...and is on a 'small' base. With the U-Wing on a 'large' base. Ah, FFG, never change....

Depending on the pt cost I may never use a list without the Tie Reaper ever.

5 minutes ago, dotswarlock said:

Now if we look at the other products starting from wave 11:

SWX71: missing

SWX73: missing

So now, we have 2 mystery SWX

According to the images of the spreads I have saved, SWX73 was Guns For Hire. So only one mystery product code.

3 minutes ago, imrandy85 said:

uh guys.......I just noticed there's an EVADE token in the box (the rebel one, who cares about the imperial one, S-FOILS)

Assuming it will be tied to the T-65 title "Renegade Retrofit". free modification and free evade action?

22 minutes ago, DeathstarII said:

Also the titles say T-65 X-wing...ship name errata coming?

Doubt it. They specified Resistance only for the Bomber title. They can do a similar thing for the T-65's.

Top reaper is 26pts bare. Following usual point differences, that makes the PS1 guy around 18-19pts or so.

They have no upgrades other than crew, though i find it weird theres an EPT (not complaining lol). That might be the main thing, but im just glad we finally got a non-large base crew carrier that can still DO SOMETHING other than crew (tie shuttle does literally nothing with a 2die attack, atleast a 3die attack can still hurt things even unmodded)

Scrambler. Heff. Zeb crew.

Estarriols verdict is “Yeah baby, yeah!”

Im excited for the x-wing titles. I can pass on the paint jobs.

Just now, Koing907 said:

Doubt it. They specified Resistance only for the Bomber title. They can do a similar thing for the T-65's.

The cards in the spread sure look like they say T-65 X-Wing only though.

Just now, Koing907 said:

Doubt it. They specified Resistance only for the Bomber title. They can do a similar thing for the T-65's.

I meant for the restrictions to equip the cards, but they could, krennic does say only galactic empire ships can be perfect prototypes

5 minutes ago, Vineheart01 said:

Saw G's 1pt crew is niche but that could be very, very painful...

If im reading it right, suffer 1 damage to mod all focus to crits when attacking. Ouch...

not the best idea, but you could put him on Norra and use r2-d2 to undo the damage he causes

squinting, I believe it is suffer 1 damage to change all FOCUS into CRITS

TIE reaper seems insanely costed, but that 2-turn-red on the dial paints a fuller picture. Small based lambdas

just undoubtedly still better in just about every way (esp the jam action giving them something to do when invariably not shooting)

2 minutes ago, UnitOmega said:

According to the images of the spreads I have saved, SWX73 was Guns For Hire. So only one mystery product code.

You are entirely correct, I will fix my post.

Only one copy of Flight Assist Astromech? Unless that s-foil title makes Flight Assist obsolete that's a really scummy, greedy move. They know people want 4 copies of that card. This pack is the perfect opportunity to include a few more.

Just now, ficklegreendice said:

not the best idea, but you could put him on Norra and use r2-d2 to undo the damage he causes

squinting, I believe it is suffer 1 damage to change all FOCUS into CRITS

ouch.....
That can easily free up her EPT for VI or something as well. Or keep the PTL so you can VT into TL and still get the combo off. Personally the crew choice on her was more pref than mandatory slot

Just now, pkreynolds said:

Only one copy of Flight Assist Astromech? Unless that s-foil title makes Flight Assist obsolete that's a really scummy, greedy move. They know people want 4 copies of that card. This pack is the perfect opportunity to include a few more.

i was thinking the same. I'll be damned if I am going to buy a bunch of Phantom IIs to get more.

Just now, Vineheart01 said:

ouch.....
That can easily free up her EPT for VI or something as well. Or keep the PTL so you can VT into TL and still get the combo off. Personally the crew choice on her was more pref than mandatory slot

I can get a better Ezra for two less points, I’ll take it!

16 minutes ago, eMeM said:

That looks completely uselsess, am I missing something?

It prevents the opponent from modifying their R1 attack dice against you. Looks like a pretty strong silver bullet against the Inquisitor...

2 minutes ago, DeathstarII said:

I meant for the restrictions to equip the cards, but they could, krennic does say only galactic empire ships can be perfect prototypes

Yep. There will probably be a line in the booklet specifying that T-65 X-Wings are different from T-70's. No need to errata the title.

So, something important to note with mr. Kullbee Sperado at PS7 there. He states when you perform a Boost or Barrel Roll action, you can flip [Servomotor S-Foils] card. So I'm thinking either the Refit or S-Foils mod allow native boost or BR, but probably have an action cost to flip the s-foils?

I'm wondering what Renegade Refit does.

<sees X-wing fix>

Help me, I won't be able to focus for the rest of the day. Please, I need more news!

2 minutes ago, Vineheart01 said:

ouch.....
That can easily free up her EPT for VI or something as well. Or keep the PTL so you can VT into TL and still get the combo off. Personally the crew choice on her was more pref than mandatory slot

I've been running a skinny Norra of VI/Rey/FFA since FFA came out and love it. still get the combo off.

2 minutes ago, pkreynolds said:

Only one copy of Flight Assist Astromech? Unless that s-foil title makes Flight Assist obsolete that's a really scummy, greedy move. They know people want 4 copies of that card. This pack is the perfect opportunity to include a few more.

I'm glad it's coming up in a second expansion, but one is enough here. I would rather get more new cards than multiple copies of something I already have.

1 minute ago, Vineheart01 said:

ouch.....
That can easily free up her EPT for VI or something as well. Or keep the PTL so you can VT into TL and still get the combo off. Personally the crew choice on her was more pref than mandatory slot

problem is we can't set her up defensively

the aux arc benefit makes SAW sorta redundant, and without the crew slot to enable her ability (rey) we're sticking to PTL and having a hard time trying to k-turn

of note, however, SAW is not primary weapon only. so that's interesting