[Spoilerish] New Resistance corvette in Battlefront 2 DLC

By Funk Fu master, in Star Wars: Armada

On 12/14/2017 at 7:32 PM, Hyperspace Ninja said:

*A Wild Anti-Capitalist appears*

Darth Sanguis, I wish to impart sympathy and/or empathy to the plight of the working consumer. Microtranaction lootbox systems are anti-consumer in their ability to decrease the buying power of the consumer. P2W forces even more burden if they seek to find enjoyment from thier game. Battlefront was P2W preadjustments. Boba Fett had access to a star card making him invulnerable durring one of his abilities.

On-topic: The additonal points of view on a starship some of us saw from differnt trend gives me intrest in its future inclusion in Star Wars: Armada.

Let it go. You’re talking to someone who believes the bonuses from stat cards are “insignificant.”

Little does he know we own the game (played mainly by my 8 year old). Upgrading the lasers and the hull of fighters and bombers at least twice changes the game very significantly. Beyond that things delve into the realm of the simple.

That being said, he misread my earlier statement, meant to only be humorous, as an attack. It was, but on the controversy itself. Again, a lot of people take themselves and their hobbies too seriously and just want to be defensive about something (usually because of other issues in their lives), but what do I know. I’m apparently a “moron.”

As a whole the game is fine. It does seem to be lacking that certain something, which I believe stems from a point differential with regards to the goals of each class, mainly the officer, who doesn’t get points based on boosts or assisting their team. Sometimes it also seems like playing the objectives is far less rewarding with points then it should be.

Ship combat is a good time though, but again we have the stat cards to make it just that. Getting to that point felt like a chore, had we known others could or were just buying up to it would’ve most likely resulted in the game being shelved. We own better games in the genre, and the only real interest stems mainly from the license.

On point: To me those new ships remind me more of giant Y-wings than anything. When I was a wee lad I had this small Y-wing toy that was metal with plastic engines that you could press a button to make pop off. The engineless hull shape is very similar. I’m willing to bet that’s just me though.

Where is everyone with regards to the new movies being represented in Armada? Feels like most folks are kind of hostile to the idea of new factions or time periods being represented. (This should be and probably has been a separate thread)

47 minutes ago, Flavorabledeez said:

Where is everyone with regards to the new movies being represented in Armada? Feels like most folks are kind of hostile to the idea of new factions or time periods being represented. (This should be and probably has been a separate thread)

What I saw last night makes me 100% certain that every ship except that gigantic space station one can easily be represented. For a 3km battleship, the Raddus and Resurgent class star destroyers don't look any bigger than the old ships from Return of the Jedi. For an 8km dreadnaught, the Mandator is barely larger than its escorts even when it's the foremost ship in the shot.

I'm going this isn't seen as a spoiler - you get very clear views of all the new capital ships.

Edited by thecactusman17
20 minutes ago, thecactusman17 said:

What I saw last night makes me 100% certain that every ship except that gigantic space station one can easily be represented. For a 3km battleship, the Raddus and Resurgent class star destroyers don't look any bigger than the old ships from Return of the Jedi. For an 8km dreadnaught, the Mandator is barely larger than its escorts even when it's the foremost ship in the shot.

I'm going this isn't seen as a spoiler - you get very clear views of all the new capital ships.

Isn’t 3km twice as big as an ISD though? I’m not a particular stickler for scale (the CR90s don’t bother me in Armada nor the A-wings in X-wing, for example) but I know others might have a gripe about it if they choose to shrink it down. Plus that’s on the small end of the SSD scale as well.

8km, however...

Makes me think if they do other time periods they’ll just be one and done box sets that have their own scale, which would be disappointing for Armada. Here’s to hoping for more ships in the Han Solo and Boba Fett movies.

5 hours ago, Flavorabledeez said:

Isn’t 3km twice as big as an ISD though? I’m not a particular stickler for scale (the CR90s don’t bother me in Armada nor the A-wings in X-wing, for example) but I know others might have a gripe about it if they choose to shrink it down. Plus that’s on the small end of the SSD scale as well.

8km, however...

Makes me think if they do other time periods they’ll just be one and done box sets that have their own scale, which would be disappointing for Armada. Here’s to hoping for more ships in the Han Solo and Boba Fett movies.

I could tell you that the Imperial Star Destroyer was a billion miles long, but if it looks the same size as the opening of A New Hope, would it matter?

The across the board scale increases in the film effectively cancel out any potential size gains (even the Supremacy looks no larger than the old Executor when surrounded by its support fleet and in some ways looks smaller), and there is simply no way that the Mandator is over twice as long as the Resurgent class. This is exactly the situation sliding scale was designed for.

On ‎12‎/‎14‎/‎2017 at 1:44 PM, Darth Sanguis said:

The dude's a moron. No skin off my bones.

Aren't there rules on this forum against personal attacks and insults? I think maybe someone needs to take a break from the forum/internet for a few days.

Edited by JauntyChapeau
57 minutes ago, JauntyChapeau said:

Aren't there rules on this forum against explicit insulting and name-calling? I think maybe someone needs to take a break from the forum/internet for a few days.

hmmmmmmm You may wanna check the bottom right corner on your screen.

Edited by Darth Sanguis
19 minutes ago, Darth Sanguis said:

yjN4bGc.png

hmmmmmmm You may wanna check the bottom right corner on your screen.

I can't see your posted picture, and in the right hand corner of my screen is the date and time on my desktop, so I'm not getting your very clever statement. All I'm saying is that you shouldn't be engaging in name calling, which is something I feel that shouldn't need said.

15 minutes ago, JauntyChapeau said:

I can't see your posted picture, and in the right hand corner of my screen is the date and time on my desktop, so I'm not getting your very clever statement. All I'm saying is that you shouldn't be engaging in name calling, which is something I feel that shouldn't need said.

That was posted on the 14th, it's currently the 18th. Time spent off the internet has already occurred. I find name calling perfectly appropriate to open and brazen trolling. If you're gonna blatantly antagonize people online, expect them to get salty.

That said, now that my temper has cooled I'm definitely going to apologize.

On 12/16/2017 at 8:45 AM, Flavorabledeez said:

That being said, he misread my earlier statement, meant to only be humorous, as an attack. It was, but on the controversy itself. Again, a lot of people take themselves and their hobbies too seriously and just want to be defensive about something (usually because of other issues in their lives), but what do I know. I’m apparently a “moron.”

@Flavorabledeez, sorry about calling you a moron. Clearly it's not the case.

Whether the attack was on me or the controversy itself, my response was inappropriate. If it's any justification, it's not that anyone having that opinion really irritates me, but rather that so many who know nothing about the game bleat it so often. Your comment was just the straw that broke the camels back. Though I do disagree about the significance about the stats on star cards and their effect on the game, since they don't seem to be effecting my ability to play the game or have fun, I can see where others would see them as a nuisance.

Edited by Darth Sanguis
42 minutes ago, Darth Sanguis said:

That was posted on the 14th, it's currently the 18th. Time spent off the internet has already occurred. I find name calling perfectly appropriate to open and brazen trolling. If you're gonna blatantly antagonize people online, expect them to get salty.

That said, now that my temper has cooled I'm definitely going to apologize.

@Flavorabledeez, sorry about calling you a moron. Clearly it's not the case.

Whether the attack was on me or the controversy itself, my response was inappropriate. If it's any justification, it's not that anyone having that opinion really irritates me, but rather that so many who know nothing about the game bleat it so often. Your comment was just the straw that broke the camels back. Though I do disagree about the significance about the stats on star cards and their effect on the game, since they don't seem to be effecting my ability to play the game or have fun, I can see where others would see them as a nuisance.

Don’t sweat it. I picked up on your post as more you having a bad day than being a bad person. We’ve all been there.

Happy Holidays, bro

On 12/16/2017 at 3:08 AM, Ironlord said:

At 316m, it is longer (slightly) than a Nebulon B...

but very slightly shorter than a 325m Arquitens. I think sizes are upscaled a bit compared to the OT-era - ST-era corvettes and ST-era frigates (the Nebulon-C, the cargo frigate) are bigger than their OT counterparts. Similar things happened in real life - WW1 warships compared to WW2 warships in a similar "role".

Yeah also look at the Nebulon-Cs which are more then 500 meters long.