3 minutes ago, Rajam said:We use the tools we're given
We clear a townie and you get upset. Interesting
How in the **** is he clear? He botched an unsolicited claim on D2 and outed you as well. I just see a bunch of people taking him for his word and that is an incredibly hazardous thing to do.
I mean am I way off base here? I’m not the one begging others to follow my vote. Based off of what I’ve seen I’ve decided to vote Ebon because I don’t trust a **** thing he has said. You guys can vote whoever the **** you want.
Gah. Just leaving work now.
Sod it
##vote Ebon.
8 minutes ago, TheToad said:How in the **** is he clear? He botched an unsolicited claim on D2 and outed you as well. I just see a bunch of people taking him for his word and that is an incredibly hazardous thing to do.
To add to this... Ebons ACTIONS have been confirmed... but if you read the setup post you will see that the role ebon has claimed can belong to either faction...
so no here is not a cleared townie
Just now, TheToad said:To add to this... Ebons ACTIONS have been confirmed... but if you read the setup post you will see that the role ebon has claimed can belong to either faction...
so no here is not a cleared townie
*he not here
1 hour ago, Ginkapo said:As I said yesterday. I need to read the whole thread again with the understanding of Ebon and Rajam.
I have not done so yet. I will soon.
I am not going to throw a vote randomly until I have done so.
I'm sorry that I think about my vote carefully.
1 minute ago, Ginkapo said:Gah. Just leaving work now.
Sod it
##vote Ebon.
So is this a careful vote?
Rajan shouldn't have to spell it out. It's unlikely that Oni would have felt it necessary to chime in and clarify that scum have a kill if he knew toad knew there was a kill.
sorry, wrong name
wigtii, now toad
that is why he is saying he is cleared town.
Well, it was supposed to be a slow morning for me, but it has not been. Some interesting developments in the last hour or so. Raj summoning quiet people to try and drum up votes rubs me the wrong way.
Can we get a vote count? Hard to go through and add up votes when I'm reading as I walk through the hallway between meetings. >.>
ugh no editing sucks.
Scum know there is a nightkill. Oni posted to clarify this was the case. If Oni was being asked by a scum why would he feel the need to actually clarify? Thus, verified. It's backhanded and as said it only works once, but I follow the logic and agree it is sound.
*to try and drum up votes without also spending justification. Reasoning: smells like desperation and trying to drive home a snap vote from somebody. I haven't seen great reasoning to vote Toad.
Just now, BrobaFett said:ugh no editing sucks.
Scum know there is a nightkill. Oni posted to clarify this was the case. If Oni was being asked by a scum why would he feel the need to actually clarify? Thus, verified. It's backhanded and as said it only works once, but I follow the logic and agree it is sound.
I agree. It's not 100%, and is something of a judgement call for the mod, but smelled legit to me.
4 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:
So is this a careful vote?
A vote on a moderate inclination is better than no vote imo.
29 minutes ago, PodRacer said:Odd.
From my PoV this is a bit odd fam.
So you are onboard with accepting Ebons reads as gospel bruv?
Not at all. You’ll notice I didn’t vote for Ginkapo, who is his “strongest” read. But since I don’t like either the Gink or Toad bandwagons, and the Vis vote not only lost its most ardent supporter but my own confidence as well (reasoning stated previously), I need somewhere I’m comfortable putting my vote. And you are it. We’ll get some insight into a few players who have been pushing you, and you haven’t contributed much. I’m also, as stated, putting a lot of stock in Ebons “I know him, he’s my friend, and this is how he is” line of thought. Also, I am tired of reading posts like this.
29 minutes ago, PodRacer said:Or tolerating Votecount Fuckery n ting?
Reasons?
I’ve gone on at length about yesterdays vote.
1 minute ago, Ardaedhel said:A vote on a moderate inclination is better than no vote imo.
I was busting his chops. As he often does to us.
Although I’m now reading Toad’s reaction to the Wiigti thing, and its pretty much how I’d feel right now if I were a scum player watching a townie fail his way into glory.
Right now I think I am going to vote Pod so I have a vote in before the deadline. I think it is the vote that gives us an idea of how well we can trust Ebon's reads, as well as those people who were willing to quickly follow him, while giving gink a day to land on his feet and play the game without being able to either waste 48 hours or conveniently discount everything he said. Either way doesn't work for me.
## podracer
1 minute ago, Madaghmire said:Although I’m now reading Toad’s reaction to the Wiigti thing, and its pretty much how I’d feel right now if I were a scum player watching a townie fail his way into glory.
I had that thought too, almost voted toad, but I think less information is gained from voting someone who is mad just cause they are mad right now. Still, a strong candidate for a vote.
2 minutes ago, BrobaFett said:Right now I think I am going to vote Pod so I have a vote in before the deadline. I think it is the vote that gives us an idea of how well we can trust Ebon's reads, as well as those people who were willing to quickly follow him, while giving gink a day to land on his feet and play the game without being able to either waste 48 hours or conveniently discount everything he said. Either way doesn't work for me.
## podracer
I had that thought too, almost voted toad, but I think less information is gained from voting someone who is mad just cause they are mad right now. Still, a strong candidate for a vote.
I don't think "podracer" in itself is a valid action 
3 minutes ago, BrobaFett said:Right now I think I am going to vote Pod so I have a vote in before the deadline. I think it is the vote that gives us an idea of how well we can trust Ebon's reads, as well as those people who were willing to quickly follow him, while giving gink a day to land on his feet and play the game without being able to either waste 48 hours or conveniently discount everything he said. Either way doesn't work for me.
## podracer
I had that thought too, almost voted toad, but I think less information is gained from voting someone who is mad just cause they are mad right now. Still, a strong candidate for a vote.
Need a ##vote there...
haha ##vote podracer
sorry 
Ugh y'all that vote count is too close.
I don't feel like Gink is scum... Ebon does seem to have been genuinely mistaken, but could well be scum anyway who misread the first post. Pod's play has been tiring to decypher through and doesn't seem to have given much. I'm willing to drop my lead on Toad for the moment being if a swing of votes of either Pod or Ebon is of general consensus
