1 minute ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

Wait...

so now you're hoping Pod isn't scum? Why don't you vote for him? You only have three votes on you right now

As I have repeatedly said - I do not think Pod is not scum, but I am not sold that he is scum. My issue is not so much with the fact that you guys are suspicious, but that your suspicions are based on a flimsy thing that does not deserve the honor of being called evidence. It seems a poor reason to vote him, and therefore I am suspicious of your true reasons. I find it difficult to believe that something like first-post flavor soft-claiming is incriminating, or that anything drastic will come of it.

2 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

As I have repeatedly said - I do not think Pod is not scum, but I am not sold that he is scum. My issue is not so much with the fact that you guys are suspicious, but that your suspicions are based on a flimsy thing that does not deserve the honor of being called evidence. It seems a poor reason to vote him, and therefore I am suspicious of your true reasons. I find it difficult to believe that something like first-post flavor soft-claiming is incriminating, or that anything drastic will come of it.

If he winds up flopping scum im going to bring this up every game we play from here play.

*on out.

1 minute ago, Madaghmire said:

If he winds up flopping scum im going to bring this up every game we play from here play.

Understandably. But I shall still defend all players I see as being targeted with little or no evidence. Of course I may be wrong, but I would rather be wrong for the right reasons than right by accident, in cases like these, given the odds.

But there is really usually so little to go on Day one. We need to vote for somebody. You could almost always argue on day one that the evidence is super flimsy.

In this case something is definitely up. I am not sure what it is, but my vote is currently on Pod for about the best D1 reason ever.

Whatever happens Nip I appreciate your support!

I do sense there are those amongst us who had predicted you would react this way....

8 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

But there is really usually so little to go on Day one. We need to vote for somebody. You could almost always argue on day one that the evidence is super flimsy.

In this case something is definitely up. I am not sure what it is, but my vote is currently on Pod for about the best D1 reason ever.

I agree that evidence tends to be flimsy Day 1. But that does not mean we merely accept that. We may settle for it, eventually, but we oughtn't start out assuming that that is all we will get. This conversation over Pod raised many points worth investigating, such as the fact that people are fine with accepting the flimsy evidence just because 'that's day 1'. Well I protest that. We ought to try really investigating on Day 1, and this specific day 1 has provided us with myriad opportunities to do so. Yet the defense for the attack on Pod is 'flimsy evidence, what do you expect?'? I expect effort! I expect investigation and debate! Not acceptance of an artificial status-quo that only remains in place due to our acceptance!

Time:vote count?

Hmm... still not liking this at all. Nippy is about the last person is support A lynch on atm.

I disliked the lynch on pod for all the reasons Nippy did, but his lack of reaction makes him the most used target for me at this point in the cycle.

##unvote

## vote Pod

10 Players= 6 to Hammer

@PodRacer (3) Madaghmire , EbonHawk , CaribbeanNinja, BrobaFett, Onidsen

@Visovics (0) Onidsen

@GhostofNobodyInParticular (3) Visovics, Madaghmire, Caldias

@Madaghmire (0)

@Caldias (0)

@CaribbeanNinja (1) Ovinomanc3r

@ovinomanc3r (0)

@Onidsen (0) Visovics

@EbonHawk (0)

@BrobaFett (2) PodRacer, GNiPs

After sifting through, pod's claim is out there and i think that's enough for me to want to know what he is..

don't like that kinda claim D1 cause if you're a town power role, it's a bullet in the foot

##vote pod

Ok, I managed to be back!

so @PodRacer at L-2 and still no word from him in his own defense, while Gnips has defended both really. With the short amount of time left, I’m happy to swing my vote if it means we are not getting another indecisive D1.

10 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

After sifting through, pod's claim is out there and i think that's enough for me to want to know what he is..

don't like that kinda claim D1 cause if you're a town power role, it's a bullet in the foot

##vote pod

If I die today/Tonight...kill Ebon!

The only reason you arnt suspect is my concious decision to stir the pot...

any other game i would Vote you on principle.....

7 minutes ago, Visovics said:

Ok, I managed to be back!

so @PodRacer at L-2 and still no word from him in his own defense, while Gnips has defended both really. With the short amount of time left, I’m happy to swing my vote if it means we are not getting another indecisive D1.

Yeah The possibilities/outcomes of my claim has been done to death...

Your willingness to 180 is a strange one tho...

AM I SERIOUSLY The only person reading Ebon as Maf right now?!

Just now, PodRacer said:

Yeah The possibilities/outcomes of my claim has been done to death...

Your willingness to 180 is a strange one tho...

I think I’ve made it pretty clear that an indecision leading to no-lynch is among the last things I want, because the numbers always work in town’s favour. And I’m not wasting that

1 minute ago, PodRacer said:

AM I SERIOUSLY The only person reading Ebon as Maf right now?!

Yes

1 minute ago, PodRacer said:

AM I SERIOUSLY The only person reading Ebon as Maf right now?!

I think so.

I am heading off to bed in a few minutes. I do not want to vote Pod, but also want to avoid a no-lynch. So if he ends up being the town's target (as it seems he is), and you cannot drum up two more votes in the remaining hours, I'll vote now. . . what say you? Vis offered to provide vote #6. . . will anybody else change their votes?

1 minute ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

I think so.

I am heading off to bed in a few minutes. I do not want to vote Pod, but also want to avoid a no-lynch. So if he ends up being the town's target (as it seems he is), and you cannot drum up two more votes in the remaining hours, I'll vote now. . . what say you? Vis offered to provide vote #6. . . will anybody else change their votes?

ME?

I wouldnt Vote me.

Its hard to protect people... when im dead...

1 minute ago, PodRacer said:

ME?

I wouldnt Vote me.

Its hard to protect people... when im dead...

Wonderful. Now you're claiming a protective role, after requesting protection. I throw my hands in the air in despair and wash them of this whole affair. I am off to bed with my vote on Broba. Hopefully a successful and pro-town resolution to this day is reached ere the time runs out.

Just now, PodRacer said:

ME?

I wouldnt Vote me.

Its hard to protect people... when im dead...

Yohoho plot twist!

Either way.... Im now 99% sure the maf Wont Nk me so The lynch is the Best way to Get me dead...

I’m tempted to just vote you because it took so long on L-2 and the end of day where no one can turn to another target to get a lynch because mainly they are not on Pod...

9 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Wonderful. Now you're claiming a protective role, after requesting protection.

Not my finest breadcrumb I concede.....

I was trying to buy the N1 kill as was mentioned pages ago....

Everything that came after was... educational

Imo Broba and Ebon are the least justified in their stances.

I will keep my vote put for now... As it seems Nobody sees the smirk behind ebons posts that I do... Town should pressure him 2moro...

Yeah thats BS to be quiet all day and then claim like that.

I hope they have a demolition expert and just blow through your protection given how arrogant you were about soft claiming power roll and throwing this whole day into a tail spin only to full claim with 2 hours left.

#unvote

#vote GNIPs