Good to hear these units will be at launch!

source? I mean there was that gencon interview, but early on Alex told us it'd be here this year as well before that changed.

Fantasy flight twitter. Shows nice scale with a picture next to Vader and troopers

Let's hope so, it just isnt the same Empire if there arent some warmachines stomping on people.

I can't attach the pic from my phone here's the link.

So excited!

Thank you FFG for this wonderful decision!

thank you!

44 minutes ago, unxbr3akabl3 said:

I can't attach the pic from my phone here's the link.

This looks great. I want to see side by side of the IA one.

It's bigger than I thought it would be.

12 minutes ago, Lord Tareq said:

It's bigger than I thought it would be.

It's massive considering the legion minis are like 32mm. I wonder how tall it is

I don't think that is s correct scale comparison. Looks much bigger than it should.

Using "luke" is 55mm (from the sorastro vid comments, mind you i don't think anyone clarified if his saber was included in that @Sorastro ) and luke being the same size/a little shorter than vader.......


Eyeballing that puts that atst at around 3 1/2 -4 vaders or `~200-250mm tall if the shot is to scale

EIDT: Just did the math and that roughly fits with the "full scale" 1:50-1:46 we estimate (based on wookiepedia's dimensions of 9.5m tall it should be 190-225mm +base)

Looks intimidating AF in a trooper focus game.

59 minutes ago, Ralgon said:

...


Eyeballing that puts that atst at around 3 1/2 -4 vaders or `~200-250mm tall if the shot is to scale

If this is correct, Luke will not be jumping over AT-STs.

There's something a little off about that picture. Look at the stands. They're at different angles, making the AT-ST look like its about to tip forward.

Also, they seem to be photographed from different distances: the lens distorts the image the closer you get to the subject unless you have a lens that compensates for that, which makes me think the AT-ST looks larger than it should.

And whoever edited the pic together wasn't likely to bring out their measuring stick and calculator to be all too precise. "Close enough" was probably the order of the day.

A better comparison from Heavy unit to figure would probably be what was posted from Essen:

5 hours ago, Force Majeure said:

There's something a little off about that picture. Look at the stands. They're at different angles, making the AT-ST look like its about to tip forward.

Also, they seem to be photographed from different distances: the lens distorts the image the closer you get to the subject unless you have a lens that compensates for that, which makes me think the AT-ST looks larger than it should.

And whoever edited the pic together wasn't likely to bring out their measuring stick and calculator to be all too precise. "Close enough" was probably the order of the day.

A better comparison from Heavy unit to figure would probably be what was posted from Essen:

Even that pic is 2 1/2-3 vaders + perspective and potential glass case distortion issues. Holding my opinion (at this point) there's no sliding scale at work, at the very least......