I'm curious to how the resolution of 'Seeker of Knowledge' (as the attacker) and 'Display of Power' (as the defender) would play out. Does my logic make sense here?
QuoteSeeker of Knowledge
Phoenix Character. Courtier. Shugenja. Air.
Cost: 2. Military: 0. Political: 2. Glory: 1.
While this character is attacking, the contested ring gains the element. If this character wins the conflict as an attacker, you may choose which of its ring effects to resolve.
QuoteDisplay of Power
Phoenix Event. Spell. Fire.
Cost: 2.
Reaction: After you lose an unopposed conflict – cancel the ring effect of that conflict. Then, you resolve that ring effect as if you had won the conflict as the attacking player. Claim that ring.
1. Attacker wins, defender loses unnoposed (step 3.2.3)
2. Seeker of Knowledge "if" ability initiates (note, this has timing priority over Display of Power because it is a mandatory constant ability, equivalent to the Forced Reaction timing)
3. Attacker chooses to resolve a ring as part of Seeker of Knowledge's ability
4. Reaction window now opens, Defender initiates Display of Power. Display of Power creates a delayed cancel effect (as the cancel takes place in step 3.2.6)
5. Step 3.2.6 occurs, cancel takes place, and the Defender gets to resolve a ring.
How's my timing? Also, Seeker of Knowledge normally grants a second ring resolution for the attacker, right?