12 hours ago, Odanan said:It could work if it was Imperial only. (instead of small ship only)
but..., but...
...
![]()
12 hours ago, Odanan said:It could work if it was Imperial only. (instead of small ship only)
but..., but...
...
![]()
3 minutes ago, Marinealver said:but..., but...
...
I know! That's the downside. ![]()
13 hours ago, Reiver said:I disagree on IG-88 being the real issue - they already had access to predator for flexible rerolls, and FCS for 'whoops, missed, face another with full mods lol' as it was. It's more attractive on non-88B models, and even then, it's... fine.
No, I feel it's, ironically enough, probably the firesprays. Yeah, they had access to rerolls in both ept and crew slots before, but my money on the 'nope, gotta nerf' being
Kath + opportunist + tailgunner + linked
... For a 6-die, agility-reducing, focus-and-rerolls buttlazer of doom.
It's a silly build, but it's the only one that really strikes me as off-putting.
13 hours ago, FTS Gecko said:That actually looks like it would have been a fun build, but it would still have been shut down by stress and requires the opponent to have no tokens. It's hardly a Rey/Kanan/Finn Falcon, is it?
Maybe we could try it on vassal or in a scenario with the house rule that firespray can take linked batteries to see if it was broken.