6 minutes ago, weisguy119 said:You mention a few characters and some weak tie-ins to explain your position that Disney fully embraces the prequels but I invite you to Google "Disney prequels"and read the plethora of articles, written by professionals, who argue that Disney is actively trying to distance themselves from the prequels. Of course they're going to promote Rebels. It's their baby. I give them props for the Maul and Rex story lines but it's hardly a full-on embrace of the prequel films. A Darth Maul film would kill at the box office but they're doing a bunch of spinoffs based on characters from the OT. It remains to be seen if the Obi-Wan and rumored Yoda movies will bring back elements of the prequel films but I wouldn't hold my breath on it.
I'm not going to spoil it here in this thread, but if you watched Rebels, you'll know that the climax of the Maul/Obi-Wan storyline leads directly into ANH. Disney had no reason to do that other than they wanted to tie Maul into the original story.
Now, Disney is going to of course promote their new products more than older ones (ie current TV shows and movies) to get people into the theatre and TV ratings, toys, etc., its new and is what is hot, but that doesn't require them to do all the work that the Story Group is doing to bring the PT story into alignment with the OT. You can read up the opinions of others about it, but I would recommend paying attention to the actual actions being taken by Disney, instead of someone else's guess about their intentions.
Its undeniable that Disney has been continuing to use the PT for source material and bringing it into the OT timeline. If you consider that "weak" or not embracing the PT, well, why the heck would they bother to write any of that?






